Citation Analysis – \Large Identification and Estimation of Production Function and Consumer Demand Function under Monopolistic Competition from Revenue Data

Citation Analysis

\Large Identification and Estimation of Production Function and Consumer Demand Function under Monopolistic Competition from Revenue Data
Chun Pang Chow, Hiroyuki Kasahara, Yoichi Sugita
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01492

153

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

13,860

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Marschak, J. and Andrews, W	1944	5	3	8.0	0.033	1.000	100%
2	Klette, T. J. and Griliches, Z	1996	5	4	8.0	0.033	1.000	100%
3	De Loecker, J	2011	5	4	8.0	0.033	1.000	100%
4	Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A	2003	5	4	8.0	0.033	1.000	100%
5	Gandhi, A., Navarro, S., and Rivers, D. A	2020	8	6	13.0	0.052	1.000	100%
6	Chiappori, P.-A., Komunjer, I., and Kristensen, D	2015	9	3	17.0	0.059	1.000	100%
7	Olley, G. S. and Pakes, A	1996	4	3	6.0	0.026	0.928	100%
8	De Loecker, J. and Warzynski, F	2012	4	3	6.0	0.026	0.928	100%
9	Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., and Frazer, G	2015	11	7	15.5	0.072	0.899	73%
10	---	2018	5	2	6.0	0.033	0.874	100%
11	Firpo, S., Galvao, A. F., Pinto, C., Poirier, A., ...	2022	5	2	9.0	0.033	0.874	100%
12	Matsuyama, K. and Ushchev, P	2017	11	6	12.5	0.072	0.860	64%
13	---	2020	7	4	8.5	0.046	0.830	57%
14	Doraszelski, U. and Jaumandreu, J	2013	4	2	5.0	0.026	0.811	100%
15	Bond, S., Hashemi, A., Kaplan, G., and Zoch, P	2021	4	2	4.0	0.026	0.737	75%
16	Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C	2005	3	2	5.0	0.020	0.737	100%
17	Flynn, Z., Gandhi, A., and Traina, J	2019	3	2	4.0	0.020	0.737	100%
18	Matsuyama, K	2023	3	2	4.0	0.020	0.737	100%
19	---	2025	3	2	4.0	0.020	0.737	100%
20	Linton, O., Sperlich, S., and Van Keilegom, I	2008	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
21	Edmond, C., Midrigan, V., and Xu, D. Y	2023	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
22	Baqaee, D. R. and Farhi, E	2020	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
23	Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., and Syverson, C	2008	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
24	Ekeland, I., Heckman, J. J., and Nesheim, L	2004	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
25	Bartelsman, E. J. and Doms, M	2000	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
26	Syverson, C	2011	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
27	Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J	2009	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
28	Van Biesebroeck, J	2003	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
29	Hall, R. E	1988	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
30	De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., and Unger, G	2020	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
31	Griliches, Z. and Mairesse, J	1999	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
32	Ackerberg, D., Benkard, C. L., Berry, S., and Pake...	2007	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
33	De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K....	2016	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
34	Lu, Y. and Yu, L	2015	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
35	Nishioka, S. and Tanaka, M	2019	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
36	Katayama, H., Lu, S., and Tybout, J. R	2009	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
37	Horowitz, J. L	1996	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
38	Demirer, M	2025	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
39	---	2021	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
40			1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
41	Kirov, I., Mengano, P., and Traina, J	2025	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
42	Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., and Pakes, A	1995	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
43	Heckman, J. J., Matzkin, R. L., and Nesheim, L	2010	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
44	Kasahara, H. and Rodrigue, J (self)	2008	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
45	Nelson, C. R. and Plosser, C. R	1982	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
46	Matzkin, R. L	2003	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
47	Stewart, J	2012	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
48	Feenstra, R. C	2003	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
49	Feenstra, R. C. and Weinstein, D. E	2017	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
50	---	1998	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
51	Harberger, A. C	1954	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
52	Imbens, G. W. and Newey, W. K	2009	4	1	2.0	0.026	0.139	0%
53			2	1	2.0	0.013	0.110	0%
54	Rovigatti, G	2017	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%
55	Aczel, J. and Dhombres, J	1989	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%
56	Arellano, M. and Bond, S	1991	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%
57	Arellano, M. and Bover, O	1995	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%
58	Blundell, R. and Bond, S	1998	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%
59	---	2000	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Marschak, J. and Andrews, W

1944

8.0

0.033

1.000

100%

Klette, T. J. and Griliches, Z

1996

8.0

0.033

1.000

100%

De Loecker, J

2011

8.0

0.033

1.000

100%

Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A

2003

8.0

0.033

1.000

100%

Gandhi, A., Navarro, S., and Rivers, D. A

2020

13.0

0.052

1.000

100%

Chiappori, P.-A., Komunjer, I., and Kristensen, D

2015

17.0

0.059

1.000

100%

Olley, G. S. and Pakes, A

1996

6.0

0.026

0.928

100%

De Loecker, J. and Warzynski, F

2012

6.0

0.026

0.928

100%

Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., and Frazer, G

2015

15.5

0.072

0.899

73%

---

2018

6.0

0.033

0.874

100%

Firpo, S., Galvao, A. F., Pinto, C., Poirier, A., ...

2022

9.0

0.033

0.874

100%

Matsuyama, K. and Ushchev, P

2017

12.5

0.072

0.860

64%

---

2020

8.5

0.046

0.830

57%

Doraszelski, U. and Jaumandreu, J

2013

5.0

0.026

0.811

100%

Bond, S., Hashemi, A., Kaplan, G., and Zoch, P

2021

4.0

0.026

0.737

75%

Chernozhukov, V. and Hansen, C

2005

5.0

0.020

0.737

100%

Flynn, Z., Gandhi, A., and Traina, J

2019

4.0

0.020

0.737

100%

Matsuyama, K

2023

4.0

0.020

0.737

100%

---

2025

4.0

0.020

0.737

100%

Linton, O., Sperlich, S., and Van Keilegom, I

2008

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Edmond, C., Midrigan, V., and Xu, D. Y

2023

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Baqaee, D. R. and Farhi, E

2020

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., and Syverson, C

2008

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Ekeland, I., Heckman, J. J., and Nesheim, L

2004

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Bartelsman, E. J. and Doms, M

2000

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Syverson, C

2011

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J

2009

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Van Biesebroeck, J

2003

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Hall, R. E

1988

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., and Unger, G

2020

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Griliches, Z. and Mairesse, J

1999

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Ackerberg, D., Benkard, C. L., Berry, S., and Pake...

2007

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K....

2016

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Lu, Y. and Yu, L

2015

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Nishioka, S. and Tanaka, M

2019

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Katayama, H., Lu, S., and Tybout, J. R

2009

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Horowitz, J. L

1996

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Demirer, M

2025

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

---

2021

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Kirov, I., Mengano, P., and Traina, J

2025

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., and Pakes, A

1995

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Heckman, J. J., Matzkin, R. L., and Nesheim, L

2010

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Kasahara, H. and Rodrigue, J (self)

2008

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Nelson, C. R. and Plosser, C. R

1982

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Matzkin, R. L

2003

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Stewart, J

2012

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Feenstra, R. C

2003

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Feenstra, R. C. and Weinstein, D. E

2017

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

---

1998

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Harberger, A. C

1954

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and Newey, W. K

2009

2.0

0.026

0.139

2.0

0.013

0.110

Rovigatti, G

2017

0.5

0.007

0.087

Aczel, J. and Dhombres, J

1989

0.5

0.007

0.087

Arellano, M. and Bond, S

1991

0.5

0.007

0.087

Arellano, M. and Bover, O

1995

0.5

0.007

0.087

Blundell, R. and Bond, S

1998

0.5

0.007

0.087

---

2000

0.5

0.007

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.