Citation Analysis

Robustifying Empirical Bayes
Roger Koenker, Jiaying Gu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00704

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

2,779

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	7	3	13.0	0.130	1.000	100%
2	6	3	12.0	0.111	1.000	100%
3	8	5	13.5	0.148	0.957	88%
4	4	4	7.0	0.074	0.928	100%
5	2	2	3.0	0.037	0.644	100%
6	2	2	4.0	0.037	0.644	100%
7	3	1	6.0	0.056	0.585	100%
8	2	1	2.0	0.037	0.511	100%
9	2	1	4.0	0.037	0.511	100%
10	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
11	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
12	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
13	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
14	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
15	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
16	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
17	1	1	1.0	0.019	0.406	100%
18	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
19	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
20	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
21	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
22	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
23	1	1	2.0	0.019	0.406	100%
24	1	1	0.5	0.019	0.087	0%
25	1	1	0.5	0.019	0.087	0%
26	1	1	0.5	0.019	0.087	0%
27	1	1	0.5	0.019	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.