← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2603.00041
Bruno Petrungaro, Anthony C. Constantinou
https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00041
78
Citation mentions
49
Cited references
9
Sections
10,122
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Constantinou, A. and others (self) 2023 11 5 22.0 0.141 1.000 100%
2 Scutari, M. 2010 8 4 16.0 0.103 1.000 100%
3 Hastie, T. and Efron, B. Retrieved December, 2023 3 2 6.0 0.038 0.737 100%
4 Pearl, J. 1995 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
5 Petrungaro, Bruno and Kitson, Neville K and Consta... (self) 2025 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
6 Tsamardinos, I. and others 2006 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
7 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W. 2017 3 1 3.0 0.038 0.585 100%
8 Meinshausen, Nicolai and Bu 2006 3 1 6.0 0.038 0.585 100%
9 Tsamardinos, I. and others 2003 2 1 4.0 0.026 0.511 100%
10 Bouckaert, Remco Ronaldus 1995 2 1 4.0 0.026 0.511 100%
11 Ferretti, L. and others 2023 2 1 4.0 0.026 0.511 100%
12 Pinotti, Paolo 2017 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
13 Kocacoban, D. and Cussens, J. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
14 Kummerfeld, Erich and Danks, David 2012 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
15 Kummerfeld, Erich and Danks, David 2013 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
16 Kermack, W. and McKendrick, A. 1927 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Kalman, R. E. 1960 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Steffen Moritz and Thomas Bartz-Beielstein 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Hartigan, John A and Wong, Manchek A 1979 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Nagarajan Radhakrishnan and others 2013 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Tibshirani, Robert 1996 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Efron, B. and others 2004 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Opgen-Rhein, R. and Strimmer, K. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Schaefer, J. and others Retrieved December, 2023 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Chiquet, J. and others 2009 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Colombo, D. and others 2014 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Spirtes, P. and others 1991 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Margaritis, D. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Yaramakala, S. and others 2005 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Pena, J.M. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Gasse, M. and others 2014 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Friedman, N. and others 2013 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Scutari, M. and Denis, J-B. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Pfaff, B. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Akaike, H. 1974 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Schwarz, G. 1978 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Hannan, E.J. and Quinn, B.G. 1979 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
40 Akaike, H. 1969 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
41 Jarque, C. M. and Bera, A. K. 1987 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
42 Komsta, L. and Novomestky, F. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
43 Godfrey, L.G. 1978 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
44 Breusch, T. S. 1978 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
45 Zeileis, A. and Hothorn, T. 2002 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
46 Hadley Wickham 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
47 Tikka, S and Karvanen, J 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
48 Shpitser, I and Pearl, J 2012 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
49 Shpitser, I and Pearl, J 2006 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.