← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Empirical Challenges with Peers-of-Peers Instruments in the Linear-In-Means Model
Nathan Canen, Shantanu Chadha
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.24215
152
Citation mentions
46
Cited references
8
Sections
12,358
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bramoulle, Yann and Djebbari, Habiba and Morton, F... 2009 17 9 30.5 0.112 1.000 100%
2 Michael D. König and Dominic Rohner and Mathias Th... 28 6 53.0 0.184 1.000 100%
3 Kojevnikov, Denis and Marmer, Vadim and Song, Kyun... 2021 17 7 31.5 0.112 1.000 100%
4 Andrews, Isaiah and Stock, James H and Sun, Liyang 2019 5 5 8.5 0.033 1.000 100%
5 William W. Wang and Ali Jadbabaie 2025 9 3 13.5 0.059 1.000 100%
6 Acemoglu, Daron and García-Jimeno, Camilo and Robi... 2015 4 3 4.5 0.026 0.928 100%
7 Battaglini, Marco and Patacchini, Eleonora 2018 4 3 6.0 0.026 0.928 100%
8 Anderson, Theodore W and Rubin, Herman 1949 4 4 5.5 0.026 0.928 100%
9 Staiger, Douglas and Stock, James H 1997 4 3 6.5 0.026 0.928 100%
10 Moreira, Marcelo J 2003 5 2 8.5 0.033 0.874 100%
11 Manski, Charles F 1993 3 3 3.5 0.020 0.843 100%
12 Erdös, P. and Rényi, A 1959 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
13 Bramoulle 2020 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
14 Brock, William A and Durlauf, Steven N 2001 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
15 Ioannides, Yannis M and Zabel, Jeffrey E 2003 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
16 Durlauf, Steven N and Tanaka, Hisatoshi 2008 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
17 Jackson, Matthew O 2010 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
18 Mele, Angelo 2017 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
19 Campbell, Arthur and Ushchev, Philip and Zenou, Yv... 2024 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Conley, Timothy G 1999 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Cruz, Cesi and Labonne, Julien and Querubín, Pablo 2017 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Michael Krivelevich and Benny Sudakov 2001 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
23 Brancaccio, Giulia and Kalouptsidi, Myrto and Papa... 2020 4 1 8.0 0.026 0.644 100%
24 Sacerdote, Bruce 2001 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
25 Calvo 2009 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
26 Mas, Alexandre and Moretti, Enrico 2009 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 Caria, A. Stefano and Labonne, Julien 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Loughran, Tim and Schultz, Paul 2004 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 Durlauf, Steven N 2004 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
30 Blume, Lawrence E and Durlauf, Steven N and others 2005 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
31 Gaviria, Alejandro and Raphael, Steven 2001 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
32 Field, Erica and Jayachandran, Seema and Pande, Ro... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Dufour, Jean-Marie 1997 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Stock, James H. and Wright, Jonathan H 2000 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Andrews, Donald WK and Cheng, Xu 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Graham, Bryan and De Paula, A 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 de Paula, A 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Leung, Michael P. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Lambotte, Mathieu 2025 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Stock, James H. and Yogo, Motohiro 2005 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 José Luis Montiel Olea and Carolin Pflueger 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Lee, David S and McCrary, Justin and Moreira, Marc... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Moreira, Marcelo J 2009 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Keith Finlay and Leandro Magnusson and Mark E Scha... 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Paul Samuelson 1954 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Volpe, Oscar 2025 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.