← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf Difference-in-differences for mediation analysis using double machine learning
Martin Huber, Sarina Joy Oberhänsli
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23877
114
Citation mentions
51
Cited references
10
Sections
13,890
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 J Pearl 2001 4 3 6.0 0.035 0.928 100%
2 Farbmacher, Helmut and Huber, Martin and Laffe (self) 2022 16 2 31.0 0.140 0.874 100%
3 Schenk, Timo Daniel 2024 4 2 6.0 0.035 0.811 100%
4 J M Robins and Sander Greenland 1992 3 2 4.0 0.026 0.737 100%
5 Deuchert, E and Huber, M and Schelker, M (self) 2019 3 2 5.0 0.026 0.737 100%
6 J Neyman 1959 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
7 Alexandre Belloni and Victor Chernozhukov and Chri... 2014 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
8 Goodman-Bacon, A 2021 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
9 Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna and Jun B. Zhao 2020 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
10 Michael Zimmert 2020 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Zhang, Lucas Z. 2025 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Michel F. C. Haddad and Martin Huber and Lucas Z. ... (self) 2024 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 J M Robins 1986 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 J M Robins and M A Hernan and B Brumback 2000 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 28 4 18.0 0.246 0.523 14%
16 de Chaisemartin, Cle 2024 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
17 2 1 2.0 0.018 0.511 100%
18 Snow, John 1855 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 O. Ashenfelter 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 J M Robins and Andrea Rotnitzky 1995 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 De Chaisemartin, Cle 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Callaway, Brantly and Goodman-Bacon, Andrew and Sa... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Hong, Seung-Hyun 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Chang, Neng-Chieh 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Blackwell, Matthew and Glynn, Adam and Hilbig, Han... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Lewis, Greg and Syrgkanis, Vasilis 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Bodory, Hugo and Huber, Martin and Laffe (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Bradic, Jelena and Ji, Weijie and Zhang, Yuqian 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 J. Neyman 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 D B Rubin 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 D. Rubin 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 D. Cox 1958 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 M. Lechner 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Frangakis, Constantine E and Rubin, Donald B 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Borusyak, Kirill and Jaravel, Xavier and Spiess, J... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Brantly Callaway and Pedro H.C. Sant'Anna 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 de Chaisemartin, C. and D'Haultfeuille , X. 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Sun, Liyang and Abraham, Sarah 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Carolina Caetano and Brantly Callaway and Stroud P... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 M Huber (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Brantly Callaway and Tong Li and Tatsushi Oka 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Callaway, Brantly and Li, Tong 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 G. W. Imbens 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Jianqing Fan and Qiwei Yao and Howell Tong 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Imai, Kosuke and van Dyk, David A 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Keisuke Hirano and Guido W. Imbens 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Huber, Martin (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 R Core Team 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.