Citation Analysis

Testing Hypotheses About Ratios of Linear Trend Slopes in Systems of Equations with a Focus on Tests of Equal Trend Ratios
Timothy J. Vogelsang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.23482

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,060

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Vogelsang and Nawaz (self)	2017	13	7	21.0	0.382	1.000	100%
2	Kiefer and Vogelsang (self)	2005	4	3	8.0	0.118	0.928	100%
3	Bunzel and Vogelsang (self)	2005	6	2	12.0	0.176	0.874	100%
4	Po-Chedley and Fu	2012	1	1	1.0	0.029	0.406	100%
5	Vogelsang, McKitrick, Christy and Spencer (self)	2026	1	1	1.0	0.029	0.406	100%
6	Jansson	2004	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
7	Sun, Phillips and Jin	2008	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
8	Zhang and Shao	2013	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
9	Sun	2014	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
10	Lazarus, Lewis, Stock and Watson	2018	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
11	Lazarus, Lewis and Stock	2021	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
12	Fieller	1954	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
13	Andrews	1991	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%
14	Hamilton	1994	1	1	2.0	0.029	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.