← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Compound decisions and empirical Bayes\\ via Bayesian nonparametrics
Nikolaos Ignatiadis, Sid Kankanala
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.20115
112
Citation mentions
77
Cited references
12
Sections
6,907
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Jiang, Wenhua and Zhang, Cun-Hui 2009 13 8 19.5 0.116 0.946 85%
2 Robbins, Herbert 1956 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
3 Efron, Bradley 2019 3 3 3.5 0.027 0.843 100%
4 Datta, Somnath 1991 3 3 3.5 0.027 0.843 100%
5 Robbins, Herbert 1951 3 3 4.5 0.027 0.843 100%
6 Cannella, Nick and Teh, Anzo and Han, Yanjun and P... 2026 3 2 4.5 0.027 0.737 100%
7 Ghosal, Subhashis and van der Vaart 2001 3 3 4.5 0.027 0.737 67%
8 Efron, Bradley 2014 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
9 Good, I. J. 1992 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
10 Johnstone, Iain M. and Silverman, Bernard W. 2004 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
11 Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Ma, Li (self) 2025 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Escobar, Michael D. and West, Mike 1995 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Koenker, Roger and Mizera, Ivan 2014 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Efron, Bradley 2011 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
15 Zhang, Cun-Hui 2005 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.511 50%
16 Saha, Sujayam and Guntuboyina, Adityanand 2020 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.511 50%
17 Donnet, Sophie and Rivoirard, Vincent and Rousseau... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
18 Neal, Radford M. 2000 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
19 Robbins, Herbert 1950 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Kiefer, Jack and Wolfowitz, Jacob 1956 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Ferguson, Thomas S. 1973 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Polyanskiy, Yury and Wu, Yihong 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Kuo, Lynn 1986 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Escobar, Michael D. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 MacEachern, Steven N. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Gilliland, Dennis C. and Hannan, James and Huang, ... 1976 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
27 van der 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Castillo, Ismae 2012 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Ro\v c 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Deely, J. J. and Lindley, D. V. 1981 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Antoniak, Charles E. 1974 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Berry, Donald A. and Christensen, Ronald 1979 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Weinstein, Asaf and Wallin, Jonas and Yekutieli, D... 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Wu, Bohan and Weinstein, Eli N. and Blei, David M. 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Teh, Anzo and Jabbour, Mark and Polyanskiy, Yury 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Favaro, Stefano and Fortini, Sandra 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Fortini, Sandra and Petrone, Sonia 2020 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Ghosal, Subhashis 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Wager, Stefan (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Sen, Bodhisattva (self) 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Lee, JoonHo and Sui, Daihe 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Efron, Bradley 2016 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Gu, Jiaying and Koenker, Roger 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Donnet, Sophie and Rivoirard, Vincent and Rousseau... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Rousseau, Judith and Scricciolo, Catia 2024 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Kankanala, Sid (self) 2025 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Ho, Sheng Chao 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Boyer, John E. and Gilliland, Dennis C. 1980 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 Balder, E.J. and Gilliland, D.C. and Houwelingen, ... 1983 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Datta, Jyotishka and Polson, Nicholas G. 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Dyson, Frank 1926 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Ghosh, Sulagna and Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Koehle... (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Weinstein, Asaf 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Brown, L. D. 1971 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Efron, Bradley and Morris, Carl 1973 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 Brown, Lawrence D. 1986 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Greenshtein, Eitan and Ritov, Ya'acov 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 Hannan, James F. and Robbins, Herbert 1955 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Han, Yanjun and Niles-Weed 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Liang, Yiguo and Han, Yanjun 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Han, Yanjun and Niles-Weed 2026 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Zhang, Cun-Hui 2003 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Datta, Somnath 1991 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Kato, Kengo 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Kankanala, Sid (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Zhang, Cun-Hui 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Liu, Jun S. 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 McAuliffe, Jon D. and Blei, David M. and Jordan, M... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Petrone, Sonia and Rizzelli, Stefano and Rousseau,... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Rousseau, Judith and Szabo, Botond 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
71 van der 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Kleinschmidt, Dave F. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
73 MOSEK ApS 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
74 Ghosal, Subhashis and van der 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
75 Lindsay, Bruce G. 1983 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
76 Lindsay, Bruce G. and Roeder, Kathryn 1993 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
77 Gine 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.