← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Testing Effect Homogeneity and Confounding\\in High-Dimensional Experimental and Observational Studies
Ana Armendariz, Martin Huber
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19703
85
Citation mentions
49
Cited references
10
Sections
8,310
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Nicolas Apfel and Julia Hatamyar and Martin Huber ... (self) 2024 9 5 16.0 0.106 1.000 100%
2 Yang, Shu and Gao, Chenyin and Zeng, Donglin and W... 2023 4 2 3.0 0.047 0.811 100%
3 Parikh, Harsh and others 2025 3 2 2.5 0.035 0.737 100%
4 Triantafillou, Sofia and Jabbari, Fattaneh and Coo... 2023 3 2 2.5 0.035 0.737 100%
5 Lelova, Konstantina and Cooper, Gregory F and Tria... 2025 3 2 2.5 0.035 0.737 100%
6 Yang, Shu and Zeng, Donglin and Wang, Xiaofei 2020 3 2 2.5 0.035 0.737 100%
7 Wu, Lili and Yang, Shu 2022 3 2 2.5 0.035 0.737 100%
8 Liu, Muye and Xie, Jun 2025 3 2 2.0 0.035 0.737 100%
9 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
10 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 J Angrist and I Fern\'a 2010 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
12 Aronow, P. M. and Carnegie, A. 2013 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
13 Colnet, Be 2024 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
14 Cheng, David and Cai, Tianxi 2021 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
15 Yang, Xuelin and Lin, Licong and Athey, Susan and ... 2025 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
16 Rosenman, Ellen T. R. and Owen, Art B. and Baiocch... 2022 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
17 Rosenman, Evan TR and Basse, Guillaume and Owen, A... 2023 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
18 Hatt, Tobias and Berrevoets, Jeroen and Curth, Ali... 2022 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
19 Brantner, Carly Lupton and Nguyen, Trang Quynh and... 2024 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
20 Kallus, Nathan and Puli, Aahlad Manas and Shalit, ... 2018 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
21 Chen, Hongruyu and Aebersold, Helena and Puhan, Mi... 2025 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
22 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 J M Robins and Andrea Rotnitzky 1995 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Jinyong Hahn 1998 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 J Neyman 1959 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Snow, John 1855 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Cole, Stephen R and Stuart, Elizabeth A 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Pearl, Judea and Bareinboim, Elias 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Ghassami, AmirEmad and Yang, Alan and Richardson, ... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Stuart, Elizabeth A. and Bradshaw, Catherine P. an... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Hatt, Tobias and Tschernutter, Daniel and Feuerrie... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Van Goffrier, Graham and Maystre, Lucas and Gillig... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Park, Yechan and Sasaki, Yuya 2024 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Athey, Susan and Chetty, Raj and Imbens, Guido 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Imbens, Guido and Kallus, Nathan and Mao, Xiaojie ... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Epanomeritakis, Aristotelis and Viviano, Davide 2025 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Brantner, C. L. and Chang, T. H. and Nguyen, T. Q.... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
39 J. Neyman 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 D B Rubin 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 D. Rubin 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 D. Cox 1958 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 G. W. Imbens 2004 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 A. Abadie 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 A. Wald 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Edward Vytlacil 2002 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
47 Alberto Abadie 2005 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
48 M. Lechner 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
49 Sandercock, P. A. and Niewada, M. and Członkowska,... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.