Citation Analysis

\LARGE Introducing the b-value: combining unbiased and biased estimators from a sensitivity analysis perspective
Zhexiao Lin, Peter J. Bickel, Peng Ding
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16310
78
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
13
Sections
19,148
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Le Cam, Lucien 1956 6 5 11.0 0.077 1.000 100%
2 Angrist, Joshua D and Krueger, Alan B 1991 3 2 5.0 0.038 0.737 100%
3 Armstrong, Timothy B and Kline, Patrick and Sun, L... 2025 3 2 4.0 0.038 0.737 100%
4 Bickel, PJ (self) 1984 10 4 10.0 0.128 0.737 40%
5 Green, Edwin J and Strawderman, William E 1991 3 3 3.5 0.038 0.737 67%
6 J.[O]. Berger 1981 10 3 9.5 0.128 0.669 30%
7 Giles, Judith A and Giles, David EA 1993 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
8 Rosenman, Evan TR and Basse, Guillaume and Owen, A... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
9 VanderWeele, Tyler J and Ding, Peng (self) 2017 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
10 Bickel, PJ (self) 1983 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
11 Wald, Abraham 1949 2 2 4.0 0.026 0.644 100%
12 Rosenbaum, Paul R 2004 2 1 4.0 0.026 0.511 100%
13 Stein, Charles M 1962 2 1 4.0 0.026 0.511 100%
14 Brantner, Carly Lupton and Chang, Ting-Hsuan and N... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
15 Colnet, Be 2024 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
16 Bound, John and Jaeger, David A and Baker, Regina ... 1995 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 Chen, Aiyou and Owen, Art B and Shi, Minghui 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Athey, Susan and Chetty, Raj and Imbens, Guido 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 de Chaisemartin, Cle 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Gao, Chenyin and Yang, Shu 2023 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Yang, Xuelin and Lin, Licong and Athey, Susan and ... (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Cornfield, Jerome and Haenszel, William and Hammon... 1959 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB 1983 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Rosenbaum, Paul R 2002 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Ding, Peng and VanderWeele, Tyler J (self) 2016 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Cinelli, Carlos and Hazlett, Chad 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Bancroft, Theodore Alfonso 1944 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Wallace, T Dudley 1977 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Bancroft, TA and Han, Chien-Pai 1977 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Armstrong, Timothy B and Kolesa 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Armstrong, Timothy B and Weidner, Martin and Zelen... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Schwartz, Daniel and Saha, Riddhiman and Ventz, St... 2026 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Wald, Abraham 1943 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Hotelling, Harold 1931 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Tukey, John W 1949 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Scheffe 1953 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 \vS 1967 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Hwang, Jiunn Tzon and Casella, George 1982 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Berger, James O 1985 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
40 Green, Edwin J and Strawderman, William E and Amat... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
41 Rosenman, Evan TR and Dominici, Francesca and Mira... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
42 Armstrong, Timothy B and Kolesa 2020 1 1 0.5 0.013 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.