← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\PaperTitle
Gabriel Saco
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15559
62
Citation mentions
33
Cited references
13
Sections
4,759
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Cook, T., Mishler, A., & Ramdas, A 6 5 10.0 0.097 1.000 100%
2 Kato, M., Ishihara, T., Honda, J., & Narita, Y 2020 4 4 7.0 0.065 0.928 100%
3 Hadad, V., Hirshberg, D. A., Zhan, R., Wager, S., ... 2021 3 3 5.0 0.048 0.843 100%
4 Zhan, R., Hadad, V., Hirshberg, D. A., & Athey, S 3 3 5.0 0.048 0.843 100%
5 Sengupta, S., Khamaru, K., Ghosh, S., & Dasgupta, ... 2025 3 3 5.0 0.048 0.843 100%
6 Kato, M., McAlinn, K., and Yasui, S 2021 3 3 5.0 0.048 0.843 100%
7 Li, H. H., & Owen, A. B 2024 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
8 Bibaut, A., Dimakopoulou, M., Kallus, N., Chambaz,... 2021 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
9 Zhang, K., Janson, L., & Murphy, S 2020 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
10 Howard, S. R., Ramdas, A., McAuliffe, J., & Sekhon... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
11 Waudby-Smith, I., Arbour, D., Sinha, R., Kennedy, ... 2024 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
12 Waudby-Smith, I., & Ramdas, A 2023 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
13 Hall, P. and Heyde, C. C 1980 3 2 3.0 0.048 0.511 33%
14 de la Peña, V. H., Lai, T. L., & Shao, Q.-M 2009 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.511 50%
15 Shao, Q.-M., & Wang, Q 2013 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.511 50%
16 Fan, X., & Shao, Q.-M 2017 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.511 50%
17 Fan, X., Grama, I., Liu, Q., & Shao, Q.-M 2019 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.511 50%
18 Bercu, B., & Touati, T 2019 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.511 50%
19 Kasy, M., & Sautmann, A 2021 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Hahn, J., Hirano, K., & Karlan, D 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Hirano, K., & Porter, J. R 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Rosenberger, W. F., & Lachin, J. M 2015 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Villar, S. S., Bowden, J., & Wason, J 2015 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Rubin, D. B 1980 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Robins, J. M., Rotnitzky, A., & Zhao, L. P 1994 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Bang, H., & Robins, J. M 2005 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Hahn, J 1998 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Tsiatis, A. A 2006 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Dudík, M., Langford, J., & Li, L 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Dudík, M., Erhan, D., Langford, J., & Li, L 2014 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Zenati, H., Bozkurt, B., & Gretton, A 2025 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
33 Chernozhukov, V., Escanciano, J. C., Ichimura, H.,... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.