Citation Analysis – A Projection Approach to Nonparametric Significance and Conditional Independence Testing

A Projection Approach to Nonparametric Significance and Conditional Independence Testing
Xiaojun Song, Jichao Yuan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15289

106

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

5,089

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Fan, Y. and Li, Q	1996	4	3	6.0	0.038	0.928	100%
2	Bierens, H. J. and Ploberger, W	1997	4	4	5.5	0.038	0.843	75%
3	van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A	1996	5	3	7.0	0.047	0.843	60%
4	Delgado, M. A. and Gonzalez-Manteiga, W	2001	40	9	48.0	0.377	0.819	55%
5	Lavergne, P. and Vuong, Q	2000	3	2	4.0	0.028	0.737	100%
6	Bierens, H. J	1982	3	2	4.0	0.028	0.737	100%
7	Stute, W	1997	2	2	3.0	0.019	0.644	100%
8	Durbin, J	1973	2	2	3.0	0.019	0.644	100%
9	Sant’Anna, P. H. and Song, X (self)	2019	2	2	3.0	0.019	0.644	100%
10	Yang, Z., Song, X., and Yu, J (self)	2024	2	2	3.0	0.019	0.644	100%
11	Song, X. and Yang, Z (self)	2025	2	2	3.0	0.019	0.644	100%
12	Zhu, X. and Zhu, L	2018	2	1	2.0	0.019	0.511	100%
13	Lundborg, A. R., Kim, I., Shah, R. D., and Samwort...	2024	2	1	2.0	0.019	0.511	100%
14	Bierens, H. J	1990	2	1	2.0	0.019	0.511	100%
15	Escanciano, J. C	2006	2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
16	Robinson, P. M	1988	2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
17	Lewbel, A	1995	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
18	Chen, X. and Fan, Y	1999	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
19	Li, Q	1999	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
20	Racine, J. S., Hart, J., and Li, Q	2006	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
21	Zhu, Y. and Bradic, J	2018	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
22	Kojaku, S. and Masuda, N	2018	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
23	Dvo\vrak, J. and Mrkvi\vcka, T	2024	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
24	Horel, E. and Giesecke, K	2020	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
25	Wu, Y., Spaide, T., Nakamichi, K., Van Gelder, R.,...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
26	Giesecke, K., Horel, E., and Jirachotkulthorn, C	2025	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
27	Gu, J., Li, D., and Liu, D	2007	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
28	Stute, W., Manteiga, W. G., and Quindimil, M. P	1998	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
29	Stute, W. and Zhu, L.-X	2002	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
30	Escanciano, J. C. and Goh, S.-C	2014	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
31	Koul, H. and Lahiri, S	1994	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
32	Mammen, E	1993	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
33	Su, L. and White, H	2014	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
34	Huang, M., Sun, Y., and White, H	2016	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
35	Wang, X. and Hong, Y	2018	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
36	Li, C. and Fan, X	2020	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
37	Shah, R. D. and Peters, J	2020	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
38	Neykov, M., Balakrishnan, S., and Wasserman, L	2021	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
39	Cai, Z., Li, R., and Zhang, Y	2022	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
40	Newey, W. K	1991	2	1	1.0	0.019	0.110	0%
41	Gine, E. and Guillou, A	2002	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.087	0%
42	Jiang, H	2017	1	1	0.5	0.009	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Fan, Y. and Li, Q

1996

6.0

0.038

0.928

100%

Bierens, H. J. and Ploberger, W

1997

5.5

0.038

0.843

75%

van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A

1996

7.0

0.047

0.843

60%

Delgado, M. A. and Gonzalez-Manteiga, W

2001

48.0

0.377

0.819

55%

Lavergne, P. and Vuong, Q

2000

4.0

0.028

0.737

100%

Bierens, H. J

1982

4.0

0.028

0.737

100%

Stute, W

1997

3.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Durbin, J

1973

3.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Sant’Anna, P. H. and Song, X (self)

2019

3.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Yang, Z., Song, X., and Yu, J (self)

2024

3.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Song, X. and Yang, Z (self)

2025

3.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Zhu, X. and Zhu, L

2018

2.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Lundborg, A. R., Kim, I., Shah, R. D., and Samwort...

2024

2.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Bierens, H. J

1990

2.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Escanciano, J. C

2006

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Robinson, P. M

1988

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Lewbel, A

1995

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Chen, X. and Fan, Y

1999

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Li, Q

1999

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Racine, J. S., Hart, J., and Li, Q

2006

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Zhu, Y. and Bradic, J

2018

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Kojaku, S. and Masuda, N

2018

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Dvo\vrak, J. and Mrkvi\vcka, T

2024

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Horel, E. and Giesecke, K

2020

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Wu, Y., Spaide, T., Nakamichi, K., Van Gelder, R.,...

2021

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Giesecke, K., Horel, E., and Jirachotkulthorn, C

2025

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Gu, J., Li, D., and Liu, D

2007

1.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Stute, W., Manteiga, W. G., and Quindimil, M. P

1998

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Stute, W. and Zhu, L.-X

2002

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Escanciano, J. C. and Goh, S.-C

2014

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Koul, H. and Lahiri, S

1994

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Mammen, E

1993

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Su, L. and White, H

2014

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Huang, M., Sun, Y., and White, H

2016

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Wang, X. and Hong, Y

2018

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Li, C. and Fan, X

2020

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Shah, R. D. and Peters, J

2020

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Neykov, M., Balakrishnan, S., and Wasserman, L

2021

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Cai, Z., Li, R., and Zhang, Y

2022

2.0

0.009

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K

1991

1.0

0.019

0.110

Gine, E. and Guillou, A

2002

0.5

0.009

0.087

Jiang, H

2017

0.5

0.009

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.