Citation Analysis

Unbiased Estimation of Central Moments in Unbalanced Two- and Three-Level Models
Dan Ben-Moshe, David Genesove
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03469

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

1,206

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Searle, Casella \harvardand\ McCulloch	1992	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
2	Patterson \harvardand\ Thompson	1971	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
3	Tukey	1957	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
4	Wu \harvardand\ Zhu	2010	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
5	Wu, Stute \harvardand\ Zhu	2012	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
6	Guvenen, Ozkan \harvardand\ Song	2014	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
7	Kimball	1990	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
8	Menezes, Geiss \harvardand\ Tressler	1980	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
9	Bottazzi \harvardand\ Secchi	2003	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
10	Gabaix	2011	1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
11			1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%
12			1	1	1.0	0.083	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.