← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\large\bfThe Innovation Tax: Generative AI Adoption, Productivity Paradox, and Systemic Risk in the U.S. Banking Sector
Tatsuru Kikuchi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02607
51
Citation mentions
38
Cited references
7
Sections
4,964
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K 2009 4 3 8.0 0.078 0.928 100%
2 Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C 2021 3 2 4.0 0.059 0.737 100%
3 Solow, R. M 1987 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
4 Brynjolfsson, E 1993 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
5 David, P. A 1990 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
6 Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombovi\'c, A., & Puri, M 2022 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
7 Fuster, A., Plosser, M., Schnabl, P., & Vickery, J 2019 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
8 Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A 2015 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
9 Elliott, M., Golub, B., & Jackson, M. O 2014 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
10 Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imb... 2021 2 2 4.0 0.039 0.644 100%
11 OpenAI 2023 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Philippon, T 2016 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Jorgenson, D. W., & Stiroh, K. J 2000 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E 2000 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M 2002 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M 2000 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R 2023 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Noy, S., & Zhang, W 2023 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., et ... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Berger, A. N 2003 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G 2002 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Buchak, G., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A 2018 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Berger, A. N., Miller, N. H., Petersen, M. A., Raj... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Frame, W. S., Wall, L. D., & White, L. J 2014 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C 2018 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Allen, F., & Gale, D 2000 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Battiston, S., Puliga, M., Kaushik, R., Tasca, P.,... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 Jackson, M. O 2017 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
29 Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A. G., Duflo, E., & J... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
30 Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A 2018 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
31 Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P 2018 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
32 Autor, D 2022 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
33 Korinek, A., & Suh, J 2024 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
34 Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
35 Bao, Z., & Huang, D 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
36 Bartlett, R., Morse, A., Stanton, R., & Wallace, N 2022 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
37 Gensler, G., & Bailey, L 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
38 Elhorst, J. P 2014 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.