Citation Analysis

Best Feasible Conditional Critical Values for a More Powerful Subvector Anderson-Rubin Test
Jesse Hoekstra, Frank Windmeijer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17843

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

3,149

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Guggenberger, Patrik and Kleibergen, Frank and Mav...	2024	4	4	6.0	0.148	0.843	75%
2	James H. Stock and Motohiro Yogo	2005	3	3	5.0	0.111	0.843	100%
3	Patrik Guggenberger and Frank Kleibergen and Sopho...	2019	3	3	4.0	0.111	0.737	67%
4	James, Alan T	1964	3	2	5.0	0.111	0.737	100%
5	John G. Cragg and Stephen G. Donald	1993	2	2	3.0	0.074	0.644	100%
6	Muirhead, Robb J	2009	2	2	3.0	0.074	0.644	100%
7	T. W. Anderson and Herman Rubin	1949	2	2	3.0	0.074	0.511	50%
8	Jiu, Lin and Koutschan, Christoph	2020	2	1	4.0	0.074	0.511	100%
9	T. W. Anderson	1977	1	1	2.0	0.037	0.406	100%
10	Douglas Staiger and James H. Stock	1997	1	1	2.0	0.037	0.406	100%
11	James H Stock and Jonathan H Wright and Motohiro Y...	2002	1	1	2.0	0.037	0.406	100%
12	Van de Sijpe, Nicolas and Windmeijer, Frank (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.037	0.406	100%
13	Patrik Guggenberger and Frank Kleibergen and Sopho...	2012	1	1	2.0	0.037	0.406	100%
14	R. L. Basmann	1960	1	1	2.0	0.037	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.