Citation Analysis

\textbfOn the falsification of instrumental variable models for heterogeneous treatment effects
Ricardo E. Miranda
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14464
108
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
10
Sections
6,819
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist 1994 7 5 10.5 0.065 0.950 86%
2 Kitagawa, Toru 2015 6 3 9.5 0.056 0.941 83%
3 Sun, Zhenting 2023 4 3 7.0 0.037 0.928 100%
4 Navjeevan, Manu and Pinto, Rodrigo 2022 4 3 6.0 0.037 0.928 100%
5 Kwon, Soonwoo and Roth, Jonathan 2024 5 2 8.0 0.046 0.874 100%
6 Heckman, James J and Pinto, Rodrigo 2018 6 4 7.0 0.056 0.874 67%
7 Kaido, Hiroaki and Ponomarev, Kirill 2025 4 2 5.0 0.037 0.811 100%
8 Lee, Sokbae and Salanie 2020 6 5 6.5 0.056 0.794 50%
9 Bai, Yuehao and Huang, Shunzhuang and Tabord-Meeha... 2024 5 4 4.5 0.046 0.737 40%
10 De Chaisemartin, Clement 2017 3 3 3.5 0.028 0.737 67%
11 Goff, Leonard 2024 5 3 3.5 0.046 0.737 40%
12 Goff, Leonard 2020 3 3 3.5 0.028 0.737 67%
13 Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander and Walt... 2021 3 3 3.5 0.028 0.737 67%
14 Ekeland, Ivar and Galichon, Alfred and Henry, Marc 2010 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Galichon, Alfred and Henry, Marc 2011 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Mourifie 2017 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
17 van't Hoff, Nadja and Lewbel, Arthur and Mellace, ... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
18 Bai, Yuehao and Santos, Andres and Shaikh, Azeem M 2022 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
19 Richardson, Thomas S and Robins, James M 2010 2 2 1.5 0.019 0.511 50%
20 Huber, Martin 2014 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
21 Noack, Claudia 2021 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
22 Yap, Luther 2025 2 2 2.5 0.019 0.511 50%
23 Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W 1995 4 2 3.5 0.037 0.511 25%
24 Rose, Evan K and Shem-Tov, Yotam 2024 3 2 3.0 0.028 0.511 33%
25 Balke, Alexander and Pearl, Judea 1997 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Huber, Martin and Mellace, Giovanni 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Ke 2020 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Dahl, Christian M and Huber, Martin and Mellace, G... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Kazemi, Amir Aamodt and Olsen, Inge Christoffer 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Fusejima, Koki 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Bai, Yuehao and Huang, Shunzhuang and Moon, Sarah ... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Kline, Patrick and Walters, Christopher R 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Kirkeboen, Lars J and Leuven, Edwin and Mogstad, M... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Pinto, Rodrigo 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Mountjoy, Jack 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Bai, Yuehao and Huang, Shunzhuang and Moon, Sarah ... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Vytlacil, Edward 2002 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Fang, Zheng and Santos, Andres and Shaikh, Azeem M... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Cho, JoonHwan and Russell, Thomas M 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Goff, Leonard and Mbakop, Eric 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Cox, Gregory and Shi, Xiaoxia 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Andrews, Isaiah and Roth, Jonathan and Pakes, Arie... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Beresteanu, Arie and Molchanov, Ilya and Molinari,... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Kleinberg, Jon and Tardos, Eva 3 1 1.5 0.028 0.126 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.