Citation Analysis

Public Education Spending and Income Inequality
Ishmael Amartey
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.11928

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,674

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Artige, L. and Cavenaile, L.	2023	4	3	5.0	0.182	0.928	100%
2	Sylwester, K.	2002	3	3	4.5	0.136	0.843	100%
3	Schultz, T. W.	1963	2	2	2.5	0.091	0.644	100%
4	Glomm, G. and Ravikumar, B.	1992	2	2	2.5	0.091	0.644	100%
5	Goodspeed, T. J.	2000	2	2	2.5	0.091	0.644	100%
6	Glomm, G. and Ravikumar, B.	2003	2	2	2.5	0.091	0.644	100%
7	Sylwester, K.	2000	2	1	1.0	0.091	0.511	100%
8	Darvas, Z.	2020	2	1	1.0	0.091	0.511	100%
9	Jackson, C. K. and Johnson, R. C. and Persico, C.	2015	1	1	0.5	0.045	0.406	100%
10	Seefeldt, B.	2018	1	1	0.5	0.045	0.406	100%
11	de Mello, L. and Tiongson, E. R.	2006	1	1	0.5	0.045	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.