← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Estimating Treatment Effects in Panel Data Without Parallel Trends
Shoya Ishimaru
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08281
61
Citation mentions
38
Cited references
7
Sections
6,607
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hu and Schennach 2008 9 5 16.0 0.148 1.000 100%
2 Freyberger 2018 4 3 8.0 0.066 0.928 100%
3 Jacobson, LaLonde and Sullivan 1993 3 3 5.0 0.049 0.843 100%
4 Sant'Anna and Zhao 2020 5 5 7.0 0.082 0.843 60%
5 Jarosch 2023 3 2 6.0 0.049 0.737 100%
6 Athey and Imbens 2006 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
7 Heckman, Ichimura and Todd 1998 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
8 Arellano, Blundell and Bonhomme 2017 2 1 4.0 0.033 0.511 100%
9 Dauth and Eppelsheimer 2020 2 2 2.5 0.033 0.511 50%
10 Roth and Sant'Anna 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
11 Imbens, Kallus and Mao 2021 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
12 Callaway and Karami 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 Callaway and Tsyawo 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Rambachan and Roth 2023 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Smith and Todd 2005 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Daw and Hatfield 2018 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Park and Sasaki 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Chabe-Ferret 2025 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Cunha, Heckman and Schennach 2010 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Nagasawa 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Ashenfelter 1978 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Newey and Powell 2003 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 D'Haultfoeuille 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Andrews 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Hu and Shiu 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Deaner 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Hu 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Guvenen 2007 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Callaway and Li 2019 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Callaway and Sant’Anna 2021 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Davis and Wachter 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Couch and Placzek 2010 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
33 Krolikowski 2018 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
34 Heckman, Ichimura and Todd 1997 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
35 Abadie 2005 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
36 Miller 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
37 Vermeulen and Vansteelandt 2015 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
38 Ackerberg, Chen and Hahn 2012 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.