← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Empirical Bayes Estimation in Heterogeneous Coefficient Panel Models
Myunghyun Song, Sokbae Lee, Serena Ng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07059
63
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
13
Sections
11,173
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Gu and Koenker 2017 5 3 10.0 0.079 1.000 100%
2 Kiefer and Wolfowitz 1956 4 3 5.5 0.063 0.843 75%
3 Yan, Wang, and Rigollet 2024 3 2 5.0 0.048 0.737 100%
4 Robbins 1956 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
5 Walters 2024 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
6 Adusumilli, Gu, and Tao 2025 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
7 Shen and Wu 2025 2 2 4.0 0.032 0.644 100%
8 Bruni and Koch 1985 6 2 6.0 0.095 0.606 33%
9 Zhang, Cui, Sen, and Toh 2024 2 1 4.0 0.032 0.511 100%
10 Efron 2014 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
11 Koenker and Gu 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
12 Koenker and Gu 2025 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 Chen 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Kwon 2025 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Cheng, Ho, and Schorfheide 2025 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Gaillac 2024 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Stein 1956 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 James and Stein 1961 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Efron and Morris 1973 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Liu, Moon, and Schorfheide 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Pastorino 2024 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Bunting, Diegert, and Maurel 2024 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 de Paula, Gualdani, Pastorino, and Salgado 2025 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Compiani and Kitamura 2016 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Song, Lee, and Ng (self) 2026 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Zhang 1997 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Polyanskiy and Sellke 2025 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Jiang and Zhang 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Koenker and Mizera 2014 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Kim, Carbonetto, Stephens, and Anitescu 2020 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Wang, Ibrahim, and Mazumder 2025 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Altonji, Hynsjö, and Vidangos 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
33 Browning and Ejrnaes 2013 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
34 Chamberlain and Hirano 1999 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
35 Geweke and Keane 2000 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
36 Hirano 2002 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
37 Giacomini, Lee, and Sarpietro (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
38 Moon, Schorfheide, and Zhang 2023 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
39 Meghir and Pistaferri 2004 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
40 Mincer 1974 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
41 Armstrong, Kolesár, and Plagborg-Møller 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
42 Ignatiadis and Wager 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
43 2 1 2.0 0.032 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.