← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

From Unstructured Data to Demand Counterfactuals: Theory and Practice
Timothy Christensen, Giovanni Compiani
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05374
72
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
11
Sections
6,140
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Compiani, G., I. Morozov, and S. Seiler (self) 2025 7 3 12.0 0.097 1.000 100%
2 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2004 4 2 5.0 0.056 0.811 100%
3 Petrin, A. 2002 3 2 4.0 0.042 0.737 100%
4 Grieco, P. L., C. Murry, and A. Yurukoglu 2024 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
5 Han, S. and K. Lee 2025 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
6 Magnolfi, L., J. McClure, and A. Sorensen 2025 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
7 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2001 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
8 Dube, J.-P. and P. E. Rossi 2019 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
9 Brown, B. W. and W. K. Newey 1998 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
10 Ai, C. and X. Chen 2012 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
11 Newey, W. K. 1994 2 2 4.0 0.028 0.644 100%
12 Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes 1995 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
13 Bach, P., V. Chernozhukov, S. Klaassen, M. Spindle... 2024 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
14 Nevo, A. 2000 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Hausman, J. A. 1994 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Goldberg, P. K. 1995 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Bayer, P., F. Ferreira, and R. McMillan 2007 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Neilson, C. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Fan, Y. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Lee, R. S. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Lee, K. 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Allcott, H. and N. Wozny 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Backus, M., C. Conlon, and M. Sinkinson 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Grieco, P. L., C. Murry, J. Pinkse, and S. Sagl 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Fong, C. and M. Tyler 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Allon, G., D. Chen, Z. Jiang, and D. Zhang 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Angelopoulos, A. N., S. Bates, C. Fannjiang, M. I.... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Egami, N., M. Hinck, B. Stewart, and H. Wei 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Zhang, J., W. Xue, Y. Yu, and Y. Tan 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Carlson, J. and M. Dell 2025 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Chen, X., H. Hong, and E. Tamer 2005 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Chen, X., H. Hong, and A. Tarozzi 2008 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Battaglia, L., T. Christensen, S. Hansen, and S. S... (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Berry, S. T. and P. A. Haile 2014 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Freyberger, J. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2024 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Conlon, C. and J. Gortmaker 2025 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Andrews, D. W. 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Hansen, B. E. 1996 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Neuman, A. M., Y. Xie, and Q. Sun 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Newey, W. K. and D. McFadden 1994 5 2 2.5 0.069 0.188 0%
43 Hahn, J., G. Kuersteiner, and M. Mazzocco 2022 2 1 1.0 0.028 0.110 0%
44 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2 1 1.0 0.028 0.110 0%
45 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2005 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.