Citation Analysis

Content vs.\ Form: What Drives the Writing Score Gap Across Socioeconomic Backgrounds? A Generated Panel Approach
Nadav Kunievsky, Pedro Pertusi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03469
40
Citation mentions
35
Cited references
14
Sections
9,659
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Potter, Andrew and Shortt, Mitchell and Goldshtein... 2025 3 1 6.0 0.075 0.585 100%
2 Crossley, Scott A and Tian, Y and Baffour, P and F... 2024 2 1 4.0 0.050 0.511 100%
3 Kyle, Kristopher 2016 2 1 4.0 0.050 0.511 100%
4 Kyle, Kristopher and Crossley, Scott A. and Jarvis... 2021 2 1 4.0 0.050 0.511 100%
5 Hanushek, Eric A. and Peterson, Paul E. and Talpey... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
6 Morgan, Paul L. and Hu, Eric H. 2024 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
7 Reardon, Sean F. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
8 National Center for Education Statistics 2012 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
9 Wang, Zhan and Chiu, Ming Ming 2023 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
10 Litman, Diane and Zhang, Haoran and Correnti, Rich... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
11 Dwork, Cynthia and Hardt, Moritz and Pitassi, Toni... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
12 Kusner, Matt J and Loftus, Joshua and Russell, Chr... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
13 Arnold, David and Dobbie, Will and Hull, Peter 2022 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
14 Bohren, J. Aislinn and Hull, Peter and Imas, Alex 2022 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
15 Fortin, Nicole and Lemieux, Thomas and Firpo, Serg... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
16 Feder, Amir and Oved, Nadav and Shalit, Uri and Re... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
17 Vig, Jesse and Gehrmann, Sebastian and Belinkov, Y... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
18 Ludwig, Jens and Mullainathan, Sendhil 2023 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
19 Kitagawa, E. M. 1955 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
20 Oaxaca, R. 1973 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
21 Blinder, A. S. 1973 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
22 Devlin, Jacob and Chang, Ming-Wei and Lee, Kenton ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
23 Devlin, Jacob and Chang, Ming-Wei and Lee, Kenton ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
24 Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
25 Ethayarajh, Kawin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
26 Tenney, Ian and Das, Dipanjan and Pavlick, Ellie 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
27 Jawahar, Ganesh and Sagot, Beno\\^it and Seddah, D... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
28 Clark, Kevin and Khandelwal, Urvashi and Levy, Ome... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
29 Rogers, Anna and Kovaleva, Olga and Rumshisky, Ann... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
30 Karpukhin, Vladimir and Oguz, Barlas and Min, Sewo... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
31 Zenker, Florian and Kyle, Kristopher 2021 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
32 Crossley, Scott A. and Kyle, Kristopher and McNama... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
33 Crossley, Scott A. and Kyle, Kristopher and Dascal... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
34 van der Maaten, Laurens and Hinton, Geoffrey 2008 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
35 Jawahar, Ganesh and Sagot, Beno\^\i 2019 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.