Citation Analysis – Reinforcement Learning Based Computationally Efficient Conditional Choice Simulation Estimation of Dynamic Discrete Choice Models

Citation Analysis

Reinforcement Learning Based Computationally Efficient Conditional Choice Simulation Estimation of Dynamic Discrete Choice Models
Ahmed Khwaja, Sonal Srivastava
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02069

175

Citation mentions

117

Cited references

Sections

11,304

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Rust, John	1987	17	9	25.5	0.097	0.937	82%
2	Huang, Guofang and Khwaja, Ahmed and Sudhir, K (self)	2015	4	3	6.0	0.023	0.928	100%
3	Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A and Sanders, S...	1994	8	5	11.0	0.046	0.909	75%
4	Bajari, Patrick and Benkard, C Lanier and Levin, J...	2007	6	5	8.0	0.034	0.874	67%
5	Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A	1993	5	3	5.0	0.029	0.843	60%
6	Sutton, Richard S	1988	3	3	3.5	0.017	0.737	67%
7	Sutton, Richard S and Barto, Andrew G	2018	3	2	4.0	0.017	0.737	100%
8	Rust, John	1994	5	3	5.5	0.029	0.737	40%
9	Robbins, Herbert and Monro, Sutton	1951	2	2	3.0	0.011	0.644	100%
10	Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A	2011	3	2	2.5	0.017	0.644	67%
11	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro	2007	3	3	2.0	0.017	0.585	33%
12	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro	2002	3	3	2.0	0.017	0.585	33%
13	Miller, Robert A	1984	2	1	2.0	0.011	0.511	100%
14	Arcidiacono, Peter and Ellickson, Paul B	2011	2	1	2.0	0.011	0.511	100%
15	Naik, Prasad and Wedel, Michel and Bacon, Lynd and...	2008	2	1	2.0	0.011	0.511	100%
16	Chintagunta, Pradeep and Hanssens, Dominique M and...	2016	2	1	2.0	0.011	0.511	100%
17	Pesendorfer, Martin and Schmidt-Dengler, Philipp	2008	2	2	1.5	0.011	0.511	50%
18	Keane, Michael P and Wolpin, Kenneth I	1994	2	2	1.5	0.011	0.511	50%
19	McFadden, Daniel	1973	2	1	4.0	0.011	0.511	100%
20	Grossman, Michael	1972	2	1	4.0	0.011	0.511	100%
21	Erdem, Tu	1996	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
22	Go	1996	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
23	Go	1998	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
24	Nair, Harikesh	2007	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
25	Hartmann, Wesley R and Viard, V Brian	2008	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
26	Erdem, Tu	2008	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
27	Gordon, Brett R	2009	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
28	Sriram, S and Chintagunta, Pradeep K and Agarwal, ...	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
29	Zhang, Juanjuan	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
30	Misra, Sanjog and Nair, Harikesh S	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
31	Chung, Doug J and Steenburgh, Thomas and Sudhir, K	2014	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
32	Kim, Minkyung and Sudhir, K and Uetake, Kosuke	2022	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
33	Goettler, Ronald L. and Gordon, Brett R.	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
34	Goettler, Ronald L. and Gordon, Brett R.	2014	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
35	Sun, Baohong and Li, Shibo	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
36	Li, Shibo and Sun, Baohong and Montgomery, Alan L.	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
37	Soysal, Gonca P and Krishnamurthi, Lakshman	2012	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
38	Derdenger, Timothy and Kumar, Vineet	2013	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
39	Yoganarasimhan, Hema	2013	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
40	Yang, Botao and Ching, Andrew T	2014	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
41	Gopalakrishnan, Arun and Iyengar, Raghuram and Mey...	2015	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
42	Gordon, Brett R. and Sun, Baohong	2015	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
43	Che, Hai and Erdem, Tu	2015	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
44	Bollinger, Bryan	2015	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
45	Liu, Qiang and Gupta, Sachin and Venkataraman, Sri...	2016	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
46	Mehta, Nitin and Ni, Jian and Srinivasan, Kannan a...	2017	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
47	Rossi, Federico	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
48	Liu, Xiao and Montgomery, Alan and Srinivasan, Kan...	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
49	Cosguner, Koray and Chan, Tat Y and Seetharaman, P...	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
50	Jeziorski, Przemys\l	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
51	Li, Hui	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
52	Yao, Dai and Tang, Chuang and Chu, Junhong	2023	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
53	Lucas, Robert E	1976	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
54	Gotz, Glenn A and McCall, John Joseph	1984	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
55	Wolpin, Kenneth I	1984	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
56	Montgomery, Mark R	1988	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
57	Pakes, Ariel	1986	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
58	Wolpin, Kenneth I	1987	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
59	Go	1989	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
60	Eckstein, Zvi and Wolpin, Kenneth I	1989	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
61	Berkovec, James and Stern, Steven	1991	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
62	Eckstein, Zvi and Wolpin, Kenneth I	1989	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
63	Wolpin, Kenneth I	1996	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
64	Meghir, C	2006	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
65	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
66	Keane, Michael P	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
67	Keane, Michael P	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
68	Rust, John	2010	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
69	Keane, Michael P and Todd, Petra E and Wolpin, Ken...	2011	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
70	Wolpin, Kenneth I	2013	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
71	Low, Hamish and Meghir, Costas	2017	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
72	Blundell, Richard	2017	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
73	Silver, David and Hubert, Thomas and Schrittwieser...	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
74	Christiano, Paul F. and Leike, Jan and Brown, Tom ...	2017	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
75	Long Ouyang and Jeffrey Wu and Xu Jiang and Diogo ...	2022	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
76	Singh, Satinder P and Sutton, Richard S	1996	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
77	Kiefer, Jack and Wolfowitz, Jacob	1952	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
78	Pakes, Ariel and Ostrovsky, Michael and Berry, Ste...	2007	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
79	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Nevo, Aviv	2013	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
80	Aguirregabiria, Victor and Collard-Wexler, Allan a...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
81	Eckstein, Zvi and Horsky, Dan and Raban, Yoel	1988	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
82	Rust, John	1997	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
83	Imai, Susumu and Jain, Neelam and Ching, Andrew	2009	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
84	Norets, Andriy	2009	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
85	Su, Che-Lin and Judd, Kenneth L	2012	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
86	Norets, Andriy	2012	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
87	Iskhakov, Fedor and J\o	2017	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
88	Barzegary, Ebrahim and Yoganarasimhan, Hema	2022	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
89	Britton, Jack and Waltmann, Ben	2021	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
90	Iskhakov, Fedor and Rust, John and Schjerning, Ber...	2020	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
91	Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
92	Schwartz, Eric M and Bradlow, Eric T and Fader, Pe...	2014	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
93	Wei, Yanhao and Jiang, Zhenling	2025	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
94	Rudin, Cynthia	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
95	Russell, Stuart	1998	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
96	Ng, Andrew Y and Russell, Stuart and others	2000	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
97	Abbeel, Pieter and Ng, Andrew Y	2004	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
98	Kamil Ciosek	2021	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
99	Brian D. Ziebart and Andrew L. Maas and J. Andrew ...	2008	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
100	Faraz Torabi and Garrett Warnell and Peter Stone	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
101	Kang, Enoch H and Yoganarasimhan, Hema and Jain, L...	2025	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
102	Peter S. Lee and K. Sudhir and Tong Wang	2025	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
103	Justin Fu and Katie Luo and Sergey Levine	2018	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
104	Adusumilli, Karun and Eckardt, Dita	2019	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
105	Imaizumi, Masaaki	2015	1	1	1.0	0.006	0.406	100%
106	Bertsekas, Dimitri P.	1987	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
107	Keane, Michael P and Wolpin, Kenneth I	1997	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
108	Daniel McFadden	1989	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
109	Dvoretzky, Aryeh	1956	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
110	Jaakkola, Tommi and Jordan, Michael I. and Singh, ...	1993	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
111	Dube	2004	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
112	Allcott, Hunt and Diamond, Rebecca and Dube	2019	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
113	Benkard, C Lanier	2000	1	1	2.0	0.006	0.406	100%
114	Bishop, Kelly C	2012	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
115	Bellman, Richard	1952	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
116	Ellickson, Paul B and Misra, Sanjog and Nair, Hari...	2012	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%
117	Sutton, Richard S	1991	1	1	0.5	0.006	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Rust, John

1987

25.5

0.097

0.937

82%

Huang, Guofang and Khwaja, Ahmed and Sudhir, K (self)

2015

6.0

0.023

0.928

100%

Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A and Sanders, S...

1994

11.0

0.046

0.909

75%

Bajari, Patrick and Benkard, C Lanier and Levin, J...

2007

8.0

0.034

0.874

67%

Hotz, V Joseph and Miller, Robert A

1993

5.0

0.029

0.843

60%

Sutton, Richard S

1988

3.5

0.017

0.737

67%

Sutton, Richard S and Barto, Andrew G

2018

4.0

0.017

0.737

100%

Rust, John

1994

5.5

0.029

0.737

40%

Robbins, Herbert and Monro, Sutton

1951

3.0

0.011

0.644

100%

Arcidiacono, Peter and Miller, Robert A

2011

2.5

0.017

0.644

67%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro

2007

2.0

0.017

0.585

33%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro

2002

2.0

0.017

0.585

33%

Miller, Robert A

1984

2.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Arcidiacono, Peter and Ellickson, Paul B

2011

2.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Naik, Prasad and Wedel, Michel and Bacon, Lynd and...

2008

2.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Chintagunta, Pradeep and Hanssens, Dominique M and...

2016

2.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Pesendorfer, Martin and Schmidt-Dengler, Philipp

2008

1.5

0.011

0.511

50%

Keane, Michael P and Wolpin, Kenneth I

1994

1.5

0.011

0.511

50%

McFadden, Daniel

1973

4.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Grossman, Michael

1972

4.0

0.011

0.511

100%

Erdem, Tu

1996

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

1996

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

1998

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Nair, Harikesh

2007

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Hartmann, Wesley R and Viard, V Brian

2008

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Erdem, Tu

2008

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Gordon, Brett R

2009

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Sriram, S and Chintagunta, Pradeep K and Agarwal, ...

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Zhang, Juanjuan

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Misra, Sanjog and Nair, Harikesh S

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Chung, Doug J and Steenburgh, Thomas and Sudhir, K

2014

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Kim, Minkyung and Sudhir, K and Uetake, Kosuke

2022

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Goettler, Ronald L. and Gordon, Brett R.

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Goettler, Ronald L. and Gordon, Brett R.

2014

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Sun, Baohong and Li, Shibo

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Li, Shibo and Sun, Baohong and Montgomery, Alan L.

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Soysal, Gonca P and Krishnamurthi, Lakshman

2012

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Derdenger, Timothy and Kumar, Vineet

2013

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yoganarasimhan, Hema

2013

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yang, Botao and Ching, Andrew T

2014

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Gopalakrishnan, Arun and Iyengar, Raghuram and Mey...

2015

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Gordon, Brett R. and Sun, Baohong

2015

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Che, Hai and Erdem, Tu

2015

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Bollinger, Bryan

2015

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Liu, Qiang and Gupta, Sachin and Venkataraman, Sri...

2016

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Mehta, Nitin and Ni, Jian and Srinivasan, Kannan a...

2017

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rossi, Federico

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Liu, Xiao and Montgomery, Alan and Srinivasan, Kan...

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Cosguner, Koray and Chan, Tat Y and Seetharaman, P...

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Jeziorski, Przemys\l

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Li, Hui

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Yao, Dai and Tang, Chuang and Chu, Junhong

2023

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Lucas, Robert E

1976

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Gotz, Glenn A and McCall, John Joseph

1984

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wolpin, Kenneth I

1984

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Montgomery, Mark R

1988

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Pakes, Ariel

1986

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wolpin, Kenneth I

1987

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

1989

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Eckstein, Zvi and Wolpin, Kenneth I

1989

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Berkovec, James and Stern, Steven

1991

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Eckstein, Zvi and Wolpin, Kenneth I

1989

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wolpin, Kenneth I

1996

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Meghir, C

2006

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Mira, Pedro

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Keane, Michael P

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Keane, Michael P

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rust, John

2010

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Keane, Michael P and Todd, Petra E and Wolpin, Ken...

2011

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wolpin, Kenneth I

2013

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Low, Hamish and Meghir, Costas

2017

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Blundell, Richard

2017

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Silver, David and Hubert, Thomas and Schrittwieser...

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Christiano, Paul F. and Leike, Jan and Brown, Tom ...

2017

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Long Ouyang and Jeffrey Wu and Xu Jiang and Diogo ...

2022

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Singh, Satinder P and Sutton, Richard S

1996

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Kiefer, Jack and Wolfowitz, Jacob

1952

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Pakes, Ariel and Ostrovsky, Michael and Berry, Ste...

2007

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Nevo, Aviv

2013

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Aguirregabiria, Victor and Collard-Wexler, Allan a...

2021

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Eckstein, Zvi and Horsky, Dan and Raban, Yoel

1988

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rust, John

1997

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Imai, Susumu and Jain, Neelam and Ching, Andrew

2009

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Norets, Andriy

2009

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Su, Che-Lin and Judd, Kenneth L

2012

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Norets, Andriy

2012

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Iskhakov, Fedor and J\o

2017

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Barzegary, Ebrahim and Yoganarasimhan, Hema

2022

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Britton, Jack and Waltmann, Ben

2021

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Iskhakov, Fedor and Rust, John and Schjerning, Ber...

2020

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Schwartz, Eric M and Bradlow, Eric T and Fader, Pe...

2014

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Wei, Yanhao and Jiang, Zhenling

2025

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Rudin, Cynthia

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Russell, Stuart

1998

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Ng, Andrew Y and Russell, Stuart and others

2000

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Abbeel, Pieter and Ng, Andrew Y

2004

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Kamil Ciosek

2021

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

Brian D. Ziebart and Andrew L. Maas and J. Andrew ...

2008

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

100

Faraz Torabi and Garrett Warnell and Peter Stone

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

101

Kang, Enoch H and Yoganarasimhan, Hema and Jain, L...

2025

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

102

Peter S. Lee and K. Sudhir and Tong Wang

2025

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

103

Justin Fu and Katie Luo and Sergey Levine

2018

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

104

Adusumilli, Karun and Eckardt, Dita

2019

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

105

Imaizumi, Masaaki

2015

1.0

0.006

0.406

100%

106

Bertsekas, Dimitri P.

1987

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

107

Keane, Michael P and Wolpin, Kenneth I

1997

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

108

Daniel McFadden

1989

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

109

Dvoretzky, Aryeh

1956

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

110

Jaakkola, Tommi and Jordan, Michael I. and Singh, ...

1993

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

111

Dube

2004

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

112

Allcott, Hunt and Diamond, Rebecca and Dube

2019

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

113

Benkard, C Lanier

2000

2.0

0.006

0.406

100%

114

Bishop, Kelly C

2012

0.5

0.006

0.087

115

Bellman, Richard

1952

0.5

0.006

0.087

116

Ellickson, Paul B and Misra, Sanjog and Nair, Hari...

2012

0.5

0.006

0.087

117

Sutton, Richard S

1991

0.5

0.006

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.