Citation Analysis

When and Why State-Dependent Local Projections Work
Valentin Winkler
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01622
130
Citation mentions
70
Cited references
11
Sections
4,488
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Michal Kolesa 2024 13 5 22.0 0.100 1.000 100%
2 Mikkel Plagborg-M\o 2021 6 5 10.0 0.046 1.000 100%
3 S\'\i 2024 13 7 18.5 0.100 1.000 100%
4 Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko 2012 9 3 18.0 0.069 1.000 100%
5 Ashesh Rambachan and Neil Shephard 2021 4 3 5.0 0.031 0.928 100%
6 Valerie A. Ramey and Sarah Zubairy 2018 4 3 5.5 0.031 0.928 100%
7 Toma 2024 3 3 4.0 0.023 0.843 100%
8 Julian F. Ludwig 2024 4 2 7.0 0.031 0.811 100%
9 Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko 2013 3 2 5.0 0.023 0.737 100%
10 Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko 2013 3 2 4.5 0.023 0.737 100%
11 Guido W. Imbens and Joshua D. Angrist 1994 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
12 Shlomo Yitzhaki 1996 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
13 Joshua D. Angrist and Kathryn Graddy and Guido W. ... 2000 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
14 Alan J. Auerbach and Yuriy Gorodnichenko 2016 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
15 Simone Auer and Marco Bernardini and Martina Cecio... 2021 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
16 Bruno Albuquerque 2019 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
17 Mario Alloza 2022 2 2 2.5 0.015 0.644 100%
18 Helmut Lu 2005 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
19 O 2005 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
20 Alessandro Casini and Adam McCloskey 2025 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
21 James Cloyne and O 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
22 Richard Blundell and James L. Powell 2003 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 S\'\i 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Livia Paranhos 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Charles M. Stein 1981 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Halbert White 1980 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Clive W.J. Granger and Timo Tera 1993 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 William A. Brock and Leonard J. Mirman 1972 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Jose 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Christina D. Romer and David H. Romer 2004 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Emi Nakamura and Jo 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Nadav Ben Zeev 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Travis Berge and Maarten De Ridder and Damjan Pfaj... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Marco Bernardini and Gert Peersman 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Marco Bernardini and Selien De Schryder and Gert P... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Christopher Biolsi 2017 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Christoph E. Boehm 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Benjamin Born and Gernot J. Mu 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Sangyup Choi and Junghyeok Shin and Seung Yong Yoo 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Ufuk Devrim Demirel 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Makram El-Shagi and Gregor von Schweinitz 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Snezana Eminidou and Martin Geiger and Marios Zach... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Mishel Ghassibe and Francesco Zanetti 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
44 O 2016 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Mathias Klein 2017 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Mathias Klein and Hamza Polattimur and Roland Wink... (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Mathias Klein and Roland Winkler (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Sylvain Leduc and Daniel Wilson 2012 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Siming Liu 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Yang Liu 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Wataru Miyamoto and Thuy Lan Nguyen and Dmitriy Se... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Michael T. Owyang and Valerie A. Ramey and Sarah Z... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
53 Daniel Riera-Crichton and Carlos A. Vegh and Guill... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
54 Viacheslav Sheremirov and Sandra Spirovska 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
55 Silvia Albrizio and Sangyup Choi and Davide Furcer... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Sami Alpanda and Eleonora Granziera and Sarah Zuba... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
57 Mehdi El Herradi 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
58 Elisabeth Falck and Mathias Hoffmann and Patrick H... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
59 Davide Furceri and Prakash Loungani and Aleksandra... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
60 O 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
61 Emiliano Santoro and Ivan Petrella and Damjan Pfaj... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
62 Silvana Tenreyro and Gregory Thwaites 2016 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
63 Peter Tillmann 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
64 Jakob De Haan 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
65 Romain Duval and Davide Furceri 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
66 Povilas Lastauskas and Julius Stak\.e 2020 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
67 Matteo Cacciatore and Federico Ravenna 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
68 Florian Loipersberger and Johannes Matschke 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
69 Xuguang Simon Sheng and Rubena Sukaj 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.406 100%
70 Savi Virolainen 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.