Citation Analysis

Compound Estimation for Binomials % Shrinkage for Binomials % : A Stein's Unbiased Risk Estimator-Based Approach
Yan Chen, Lihua Lei
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.25042
83
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
10
Sections
13,258
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Xie, Xianchao and Kou, SC and Brown, Lawrence D 2012 9 4 14.0 0.108 1.000 100%
2 Chen, Jiafeng (self) 2025 8 3 14.0 0.096 1.000 100%
3 Bell, Alex and Chetty, Raj and Jaravel, Xavier and... 2019 4 3 7.0 0.048 0.928 100%
4 Kline, Patrick and Rose, Evan K. and Walters, Chri... 2024 4 3 7.0 0.048 0.928 100%
5 Chen, Jiafeng and Lei, Lihua and Sudijono, Timothy... (self) 2025 3 3 2.5 0.036 0.843 100%
6 Kline, Patrick and Walters, Christopher 2021 3 3 3.5 0.036 0.843 100%
7 Li, Jessie 2024 4 2 8.0 0.048 0.811 100%
8 Gang, Bowen and Fu, Luella and James, Gareth and S... 2023 3 2 6.0 0.036 0.737 100%
9 Griffin, Barry S and Krutchkoff, Richard G 1971 2 2 1.5 0.024 0.644 100%
10 Neufeld, Anna and Dharamshi, Ameer and Gao, Lucy L... 2024 3 1 6.0 0.036 0.585 100%
11 Leiner, James and Duan, Boyan and Wasserman, Larry... 2025 3 1 6.0 0.036 0.585 100%
12 Kline, Patrick and Rose, Evan K and Walters, Chris... 2022 2 1 4.0 0.024 0.511 100%
13 Fienberg, Stephen E and Holland, Paul W 1973 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 Lawrence D. Brown 2008 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 Efron, Bradley 2012 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 Robbins, Herbert 1951 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Stein, Charles 1972 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Barbour, Andrew D and Chryssaphinou, Ourania 2001 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Ehm, Werner 1991 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Soon, Spario YT 1996 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Stein, Charles M 1981 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Li, Ker-Chau 1985 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Li, Ker-Chau 1986 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Li, Ker-Chau 1987 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Johnstone, Iain 1988 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Kneip, Alois 1994 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Donoho, David L and Johnstone, Iain M 1995 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Tibshirani, Ryan J and Taylor, Jonathan 2012 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Candes, Emmanuel J and Sing-Long, Carlos A and Trz... 2013 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Mukherjee, Ashin and Chen, Kun and Wang, Naisyin a... (self) 2015 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Ghosh, Sulagna and Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Koehle... 2025 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Nobel, Parth and Cande 2023 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Karamikabir, H and Afshari, M and Lak, F 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Kim, Kwanyoung and Ye, Jong Chul 2021 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Eldar, Yonina C 2008 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Berry, Donald A and Christensen, Ronald 1979 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Albert, James H 1984 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Sobel, Marc J 1993 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Sivaganesan, S and Berger, James 1993 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Consonni, Guido and Veronese, Piero 1995 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Weiss, Robert E 2010 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Gu, Jiaying and Ignatiadis, Nikolaos and Shaikh, A... 2025 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Newey, WK and Robins, JR 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Chen, Jiafeng (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Billingsley, Patrick 2013 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
47 Crame 1936 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.