Citation Analysis

Testing Monotonicity in a Finite Population
Jiafeng Chen, Jonathan Roth, Jann Spiess
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.25032
25
Citation mentions
18
Cited references
8
Sections
5,101
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Copas, J. B. 1973 3 3 3.5 0.120 0.737 67%
2 Christy, Neil and Kowalski, Amanda Ellen 2025 3 2 5.0 0.120 0.737 100%
3 Heckman, James J. and Smith, Jeffrey and Clements,... 1997 2 2 3.0 0.080 0.644 100%
4 Ding, Peng and Miratrix, Luke W. 2019 2 2 4.0 0.080 0.644 100%
5 Caughey, Devin and Dafoe, Allan and Li, Xinran and... 2023 2 1 2.0 0.080 0.511 100%
6 Manski, Charles F 1997 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
7 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
8 Kitagawa, Toru 2015 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
9 Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W 1995 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
10 Li, Xinran and Ding, Peng 2017 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
11 Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
12 Kline, Brendan and Masten, Matthew A 2025 1 1 1.0 0.040 0.406 100%
13 Reichardt, Charles S. and Gollob, Harry F. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.040 0.406 100%
14 Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.040 0.406 100%
15 Gelman, Andrew and Mikhaeil, Jonas M 2025 1 1 2.0 0.040 0.406 100%
16 Lehmann, Erich Leo and Casella, George 1998 1 1 2.0 0.040 0.406 100%
17 Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.040 0.406 100%
18 Robbins, Herbert 1955 1 1 0.5 0.040 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.