← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Evaluating Counterfactual Policies Using Instruments
Michal Kolesár, José Luis Montiel Olea, Jonathan Roth
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24096
114
Citation mentions
46
Cited references
8
Sections
16,322
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Frandsen, Lefgren, Leslie 2023 10 5 16.0 0.088 1.000 100%
2 Sigstad 2025 10 6 17.0 0.088 1.000 100%
3 Arnold, Dobbie, Hull 2022 9 3 14.0 0.079 1.000 100%
4 Agan, Doleac, Harvey 2023 5 3 8.0 0.044 1.000 100%
5 2025 5 3 8.0 0.044 1.000 100%
6 Chan, Gentzkow, Yu 2022 4 4 7.0 0.035 0.928 100%
7 Kitagawa 2021 4 3 6.0 0.035 0.928 100%
8 Albright 2022 5 2 7.0 0.044 0.874 100%
9 Heckman, Vytlacil 2005 6 2 9.0 0.053 0.874 100%
10 Imbens, Angrist 1994 3 2 4.0 0.026 0.737 100%
11 Kling 2006 3 2 5.0 0.026 0.737 100%
12 Heckman, Vytlacil 1999 3 2 5.0 0.026 0.737 100%
13 Balke, Pearl 1997 3 2 4.0 0.026 0.737 100%
14 Dudley 2002 3 2 6.0 0.026 0.737 100%
15 Aizer, Doyle 2015 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Dobbie, Goldin, Yang 2018 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Mueller-Smith 2015 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
18 Mogstad, Torgovitsky, Walters 2021 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Richardson, Robins 2014 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Heckman, Vytlacil 2007 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Manski 1990 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
22 Kamat 2019 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
23 Machado, Shaikh, Vytlacil 2019 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
24 Dobbie, Song 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Sampat, Williams 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Doyle 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 de Chaisemartin 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Small, Tan, Ramsahai, Lorch, Brookhart 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Mogstad, Torgovitsky 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Locher, Stensrud, Sarvet 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Angelova, Dobbie, Yang 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Ura, Zhang 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Sigstad 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Swanson, Hernán, Miller, Robins, Richardson 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 2025 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Chen, Flores 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Norris, Pecenco, Weaver 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Vytlacil 2002 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Heckman, Urzúa, Vytlacil 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Song, Guo, Chan, Richardson 2025 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Baron, Doyle\bibnamedelima Jr, Emanuel, Hull, Ryan 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Iaryczower, Shum 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Manski 1997 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Skemer, Redcross, Bloom 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Stevenson 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Marshall, Olkin, Arnold 2011 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.