← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Sharp Structure-Agnostic Lower Bounds for General Linear Functional Estimation
Jikai Jin, Vasilis Syrgkanis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17341
139
Citation mentions
83
Cited references
18
Sections
8,799
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 6 4 10.0 0.043 1.000 100%
2 5 3 8.0 0.036 1.000 100%
3 14 6 25.0 0.101 0.976 93%
4 9 6 14.0 0.065 0.920 78%
5 3 2 4.0 0.022 0.737 100%
6 3 2 4.0 0.022 0.737 100%
7 3 2 4.0 0.022 0.737 100%
8 3 2 5.0 0.022 0.737 100%
9 3 2 3.0 0.022 0.644 67%
10 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
11 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
12 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
13 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
14 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
15 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
16 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
17 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
18 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
19 2 2 3.0 0.014 0.644 100%
20 2 2 4.0 0.014 0.644 100%
21 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
22 2 1 2.0 0.014 0.511 100%
23 3 2 3.0 0.022 0.511 33%
24 2 1 4.0 0.014 0.511 100%
25 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
26 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
28 Lesley Wood, Matthias Egger, Lise Lotte Gluud, Ken... 7644 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
29 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
67 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
68 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
69 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
70 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
71 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
72 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
73 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
74 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
76 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
77 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
78 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
79 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
80 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
81 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
82 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
83 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.