← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\normalfont% From Many Models, One: Macroeconomic Forecasting with Reservoir Ensembles
Giovanni Ballarin, Lyudmila Grigoryeva, Yui Ching Li
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13642
184
Citation mentions
82
Cited references
17
Sections
2,868
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Littlestone, N. and Warmuth, M. K 1994 5 4 9.0 0.027 1.000 100%
2 van Erven, T., Koolen, W. M., de Rooij, S., and Gr... 2011 5 4 8.0 0.027 1.000 100%
3 de Rooij, S., van Erven, T., Gr\"unwald, P. D., an... 2014 11 6 18.5 0.060 0.969 91%
4 Cesa-Bianchi, N. and Lugosi, G 2006 5 4 7.5 0.027 0.928 80%
5 Timmermann, A 2006 4 3 4.5 0.022 0.843 75%
6 Ballarin, G., Dellaportas, P., Grigoryeva, L., Hir... (self) 2024a 31 14 40.0 0.168 0.834 58%
7 Freund, Y. and Schapire, R. E 1997 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
8 Mourtada, J. and Ga\"iffas, S 2019 15 10 14.5 0.082 0.737 40%
9 Chernov, A. and Zhdanov, F 2010 4 4 5.0 0.022 0.737 50%
10 Bates, J. M. and Granger, C 1969 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
11 Vovk, V 1995 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
12 Grigoryeva, L. and Ortega, J.-P (self) 2018a 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
13 Gonon, L., Grigoryeva, L., and Ortega, J.-P (self) 2020b 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
14 Gonon, L., Grigoryeva, L., and Ortega, J.-P (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
15 Cesa-Bianchi, N., Freund, Y., Haussler, D., Helmbo... 1997 2 2 4.0 0.011 0.644 100%
16 Rio, E 2017 6 3 4.5 0.033 0.550 17%
17 Shalev-Shwartz, S 2012 2 2 1.5 0.011 0.511 50%
18 Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W 2002 3 2 3.0 0.016 0.511 33%
19 Winkler, R. L. and Makridakis, S 1983 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
20 Clemen, R. T 1989 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
21 Granger, C. W. J 1989 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
22 Athey, S 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
23 Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
24 Hansen, B. E 2008 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
25 Cheng, X. and Hansen, B. E 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
26 Kim, H. H. and Swanson, N. R 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
27 den Reijer, A. and Johansson, A 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
28 Bolhuis, M. A. and Rayner, B 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
29 Fuleky, P., editor 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
30 Masini, R. P., Medeiros, M. C., and Mendes, E. F 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
31 Wang, X., Hyndman, R. J., Li, F., and Kang, Y 2023 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
32 Wallis, K. F 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
33 Koolen, W. M., van Erven, T., and Gr\"unwald, P 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
34 Wintenberger, O 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Ito, S., Tsuchiya, T., and Honda, J 2024 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Wintenberger, O 2024 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Ghysels, E., Sinko, A., and Valkanov, R 2007 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
38 Geweke, J 1977 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Sargent, T. J. and Sims, C. A 1977 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Jaeger, H 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Maass, W 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Luko\vsevi\vcius, M. and Jaeger, H 2009 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Grigoryeva, L. and Ortega, J.-P (self) 2018b 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Gonon, L. and Ortega, J.-P 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Ballarin, G., Grigoryeva, L., and Ortega, J.-P (self) 2024b 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Stone, C. J 1982 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Li, Q. and Racine, J 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Tsybakov, A. B 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Christmann, A. and Steinwart, I 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Sch\"olkopf, B., Smola, A. J., Bach, F., and Other... 2002 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Berlinet, A. and Thomas-Agnan, C 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Foster, D. P 1991 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Foster, D. P. and Vohra, R. V 1993 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Freund, Y. and Schapire, R. E 1999 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Boyd, S. P. and Vandenberghe, L 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Auer, P. and Chiang, C.-K 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Luo, H. and Schapire, R. E 2015 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Gasparin, M. and Ramdas, A 2025 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Bergmeir, C. and Benitez, J. M 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Bergmeir, C., Hyndman, R. J., and Koo, B 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Hyndman, R. J. and Athanasopoulos, G 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Frankle, J. and Carbin, M 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Malach, E., Yehudai, G., Shalev-Schwartz, S., and ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Ma, X., Yuan, G., Shen, X., Chen, T., Chen, X., Ch... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Sreenivasan, K., Sohn, J.-y., Yang, L., Grinde, M.... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Zhao, J., Schaefer, F. T., and Anandkumar, A 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Bolager, E. L., Burak, I., Datar, C., Sun, Q., and... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Gonon, L., Grigoryeva, L., and Ortega, J.-P (self) 2020a 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Bai, J. and Ng, S 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Doz, C. and Fuleky, P 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Barigozzi, M. and Hallin, M 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Hang, H 2015 5 3 2.5 0.027 0.215 0%
75 Hang, H. and Steinwart, I 2017 3 3 1.5 0.016 0.182 0%
76 McCracken, M. W. and Ng, S 2016 3 2 1.5 0.016 0.159 0%
77 McCracken, M. W. and Ng, S 2020 3 2 1.5 0.016 0.159 0%
78 Samson, P.-M 2000 4 1 2.0 0.022 0.139 0%
79 Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W 1996 2 1 1.0 0.011 0.110 0%
80 Boucheron, S., Lugosi, G., and Massart, P 2013 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
81 Alquier, P., Li, X., and Wintenberger, O 2013 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
82 Dedecker, J., Doukhan, P., Lang, G., Le\'on, J. R.... 2007 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.