Citation Analysis – Bounds on inequality with incomplete data

Bounds on inequality with incomplete data
James Banks, Thomas Glinnan, Tatiana Komarova
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07709

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

10,461

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Werner Dinkelbach	1967	8	4	15.0	0.107	1.000	100%
2	Zijian Fang and Andres Santos	2019	5	3	9.0	0.067	1.000	100%
3	Office of Business Economics, U.S. Department of C...	1958	3	2	6.0	0.040	0.737	100%
4	Joseph L. Gastwirth	1972	6	1	6.0	0.080	0.693	100%
5	Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W.	1962	2	2	3.0	0.027	0.644	100%
6	Stephen M. Robinson	1980	4	1	8.0	0.053	0.644	100%
7	Asen L. Dontchev and R. Tyrrell Rockafellar	2014	4	1	8.0	0.053	0.644	100%
8	James B. McDonald and Michael R. Ransom	1981	2	1	2.0	0.027	0.511	100%
9	Joseph L. Gastwirth and Tapan K. Nayak and Abba M....	1986	2	1	2.0	0.027	0.511	100%
10	Dilanka S. Dedduwakumara and Luke A. Prendergast	2019	2	1	2.0	0.027	0.511	100%
11	Aad W. van der Vaart and Jon A. Wellner	1996	2	1	4.0	0.027	0.511	100%
12	Patrick Billingsley	1995	2	1	4.0	0.027	0.511	100%
13	Goldsmith, S.		2	1	4.0	0.027	0.511	100%
14	Farhad Mehran	1975	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
15	Giorgi, Giovanni Maria and Pallini, Andrea	1987	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
16	Mike Fuller	1979	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
17	Silber, Jaques	1990	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
18	Ogwang, Tomson	2003	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
19	David Murray	1978	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
20	Jorda, Vanesa and Sarabia, José María and Jäntti, ...	2021	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
21	Frank A. Cowell	1991	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
22	Philip J. Cross and Charles F. Manski	2002	1	1	1.0	0.013	0.406	100%
23	Donaldson, David and Weymark, John A.	1980	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
24	Palma, Jose	2011	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
25	Bonferroni, Carlo E.	1930	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
26	H. Theil	1953	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
27	Atkinson, Anthony B.	1970	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
28	Ödön Éltető and E. Frigyes	1968	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
29	Kolm, Serge-Christophe	1976	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
30	Zenga, M.	2007	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
31	Peter Hall and Charles C. Heyde	1980	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
32	William G. Cochran	1977	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
33	Sharon L. Lohr	2010	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
34	Jaroslav Ha	1960	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
35	Stephen Portnoy	1985	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
36	Juster, F.Thomas and Smith, James P.	1997	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
37	Juster, F.Thomas and Smith, James.P. and Stafford,...	1999	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
38	Steptoe, Andrew and Breeze, Elizabeth and Banks, J... (self)	2013	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
39	Donald B Rubin	1987	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
40	Goldsmith, S. and Jaszi, G. and Kaitz, H. and Lieb...	1954	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
41	Edward C. Budd	1970	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
42	Lindert, Peter H.		1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
43	Saez, Emmanuel		1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%
44	U.S. Census Bureau	1948	1	1	2.0	0.013	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Werner Dinkelbach

1967

15.0

0.107

1.000

100%

Zijian Fang and Andres Santos

2019

9.0

0.067

1.000

100%

Office of Business Economics, U.S. Department of C...

1958

6.0

0.040

0.737

100%

Joseph L. Gastwirth

1972

6.0

0.080

0.693

100%

Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W.

1962

3.0

0.027

0.644

100%

Stephen M. Robinson

1980

8.0

0.053

0.644

100%

Asen L. Dontchev and R. Tyrrell Rockafellar

2014

8.0

0.053

0.644

100%

James B. McDonald and Michael R. Ransom

1981

2.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Joseph L. Gastwirth and Tapan K. Nayak and Abba M....

1986

2.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Dilanka S. Dedduwakumara and Luke A. Prendergast

2019

2.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Aad W. van der Vaart and Jon A. Wellner

1996

4.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Patrick Billingsley

1995

4.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Goldsmith, S.

4.0

0.027

0.511

100%

Farhad Mehran

1975

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Giorgi, Giovanni Maria and Pallini, Andrea

1987

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Mike Fuller

1979

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Silber, Jaques

1990

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Ogwang, Tomson

2003

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

David Murray

1978

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Jorda, Vanesa and Sarabia, José María and Jäntti, ...

2021

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Frank A. Cowell

1991

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Philip J. Cross and Charles F. Manski

2002

1.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Donaldson, David and Weymark, John A.

1980

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Palma, Jose

2011

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Bonferroni, Carlo E.

1930

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

H. Theil

1953

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Atkinson, Anthony B.

1970

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Ödön Éltető and E. Frigyes

1968

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Kolm, Serge-Christophe

1976

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Zenga, M.

2007

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Peter Hall and Charles C. Heyde

1980

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

William G. Cochran

1977

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Sharon L. Lohr

2010

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Jaroslav Ha

1960

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Stephen Portnoy

1985

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Juster, F.Thomas and Smith, James P.

1997

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Juster, F.Thomas and Smith, James.P. and Stafford,...

1999

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Steptoe, Andrew and Breeze, Elizabeth and Banks, J... (self)

2013

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Donald B Rubin

1987

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Goldsmith, S. and Jaszi, G. and Kaitz, H. and Lieb...

1954

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Edward C. Budd

1970

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Lindert, Peter H.

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Saez, Emmanuel

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

U.S. Census Bureau

1948

2.0

0.013

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.