Citation Analysis

Limitations of Randomization Tests in Finite Samples
Deniz Dutz, Xinyi Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07099
16
Citation mentions
14
Cited references
8
Sections
1,478
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bahadur \harvardand\ Savage 1956 2 2 3.0 0.125 0.644 100%
2 Lehmann, Romano \harvardand\ Casella 1986 2 1 4.0 0.125 0.511 100%
3 Ritzwoller, Romano \harvardand\ Shaikh 2024 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
4 Lehmann \harvardand\ Loh 1990 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
5 Romano 2004 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
6 Romano 1989 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
7 Romano 1990 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
8 DiCiccio \harvardand\ Romano 2017 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
9 Canay, Romano \harvardand\ Shaikh 2017 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
10 Lei \harvardand\ Bickel 2021 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
11 Pouliot 2024 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
12 Bai, Liu, Shaikh \harvardand\ Tabord-Meehan 2024 1 1 1.0 0.062 0.406 100%
13 Zhang \harvardand\ Zhao 2023 1 1 2.0 0.062 0.406 100%
14 Kagan, Linnik \harvardand\ Rao 1973 1 1 0.5 0.062 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.