Citation Analysis

\bf Testing the Significance of the Difference-in-Differences Coefficient via Doubly Randomised Inference
Stanisław Marek Sergiusz Halkiewicz, Andrzej Kałuża
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06946
80
Citation mentions
53
Cited references
8
Sections
5,161
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B. 2015 6 5 10.0 0.075 1.000 100%
2 Fisher, Ronald A. 1935 4 4 7.0 0.050 0.928 100%
3 Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2002 4 4 8.0 0.050 0.928 100%
4 MacKinnon, James G. and Webb, Matthew D. 2020 3 3 5.0 0.037 0.843 100%
5 Neyman, Jerzy 1990 3 3 5.0 0.037 0.843 100%
6 Caughey, Devin and Dafoe, Allan and Li, Xinran and... 2023 3 3 6.0 0.037 0.843 100%
7 Bonnini, Stefano and Assegie, Getnet Melak and Trz... 2024 3 2 6.0 0.037 0.737 100%
8 Cameron, A. Colin and Trivedi, Pravin K. 2005 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
9 Halkiewicz, Stanisław M. S. (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
10 Conley, Timothy G. and Taber, Christopher R. 2011 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
11 Ferman, Bruno and Pinto, Cristine 2019 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
12 Rubin, Donald B. 1974 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
13 Young, Alwyn 2019 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
14 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido 2017 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
15 Stanisław M. S. Halkiewicz (self) 2024 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
16 Halkiewicz, Stanisław M. S. (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
17 D. Card and A. B. Krueger 1994 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
18 Joshua D. Angrist and Jörn Steffen Pischke 2008 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
19 Ellen C. Caniglia and Eleanor J. Murray 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
20 Thurston Domina and Andrew McEachin and Andrew Pen... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
21 Furquim, Fernando and Corral, Daniel and Hillman, ... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Ghadir Asadi 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Brantly Callaway 2022 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Wei Deng and Nan Xu and Haotian Li and Fangyao Liu... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Guoli Chen and Craig Crossland and Sterling Huang 2016 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Greg Distelhorst and Jens Hainmueller and Richard ... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 Fredriksson, Anders and Oliveira, Gustavo M. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Arkhangelsky, Dmitry and Athey, Susan and Hirshber... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Puchkin, Nikita and Ulyanov, Vladimir 2023 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Ahmad, Rauf and Johansson, Per and Schultzberg, M\... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Efron, Bradley and Hastie, Trevor 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Keller, Bryan and Branson, Zach 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Hershberger, Scott L. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 James Heckman and Rodrigo Pinto and Azeem M. Shaik... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 Canay, Ivan A. and Romano, Joseph P. and Shaikh, A... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Abadie, Alberto and Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Basse, Guillaume and Ding, Peng and Feller, Avi an... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Peter M. Aronow and Cyrus Samii 2017 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
40 Susan Athey and Dean Eckles and Guido W. Imbens 2018 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
41 Johan Ugander and Hao Yin 2023 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
42 Xinran Li and Peng Ding and Qian Lin and Dawei Yan... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
43 Cattaneo, Matias D. and Frandsen, Brigham R. and T... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
44 Justin Khim and Po-Ling Loh and 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
45 R Core Team 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
46 Juan M. Villa 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
47 Paul R Rosenbaum and Donald B Rubin 1985 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
48 Minsoo Kang and Brian G. Ragan and Jae Hyeon Park 2008 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
49 Esther Duflo 2001 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
50 David Card and Alan B. Krueger 1994 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
51 Elias Dinas and Alexander Kustov and Ekaterina Kol... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
52 Morris, Sidney A. 2024 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
53 Paulo Saraiva 2023 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.