Citation Analysis

\textbfImplicit score-driven filters \\ for time-varying parameter models
Rutger-Jan Lange, Bram van Os, Dick van Dijk
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02744
157
Citation mentions
76
Cited references
12
Sections
9,607
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Rockafellar, R. T 1976 5 3 7.0 0.032 1.000 100%
2 Asi, H. and J. C. Duchi 2019 8 3 13.0 0.051 1.000 100%
3 Creal, D., S. J. Koopman, and A. Lucas 2013 7 4 10.0 0.045 1.000 100%
4 Koopman, S. J., A. Lucas, and M. Scharth 2016 7 4 11.0 0.045 0.950 86%
5 Artemova, M., F. Blasques, J. van Brummelen, and S... 2022a 6 4 9.0 0.038 0.941 83%
6 Patrascu, A. and I. Necoara 2018 4 3 4.0 0.025 0.928 100%
7 Harvey, A. C 2013 4 3 4.0 0.025 0.928 100%
8 Straumann, D. and T. Mikosch 2006 3 3 5.0 0.019 0.843 100%
9 Boyd, S. and L. Vandenberghe 2004 3 3 5.0 0.019 0.843 100%
10 Nesterov, Y 2018 3 3 5.0 0.019 0.843 100%
11 Toulis, P. and E. M. Airoldi 2017 3 3 4.5 0.019 0.843 100%
12 Engle, R. F. and S. Manganelli 2004 4 2 6.0 0.025 0.811 100%
13 Lange, R.-J (self) 2024a 4 2 8.0 0.025 0.811 100%
14 Harvey, A. C. and A. Luati 2014 6 3 6.0 0.038 0.794 50%
15 Blasques, F., J. van Brummelen, S. J. Koopman, and... 2022 9 6 10.5 0.057 0.763 44%
16 Ryu, E. K. and S. Boyd 2016 3 2 4.5 0.019 0.737 100%
17 Toulis, P., T. Horel, and E. M. Airoldi 2021 3 2 3.0 0.019 0.737 100%
18 Benveniste, A., M. Metivier, and P. Priouret 2012 3 2 3.0 0.019 0.737 100%
19 Bougerol, P 1993 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Bauschke, H. H., J. M. Borwein, and P. L. Combette... 2003 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Bianchi, P 2016 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Kushner, H 2010 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
23 Nagumo, J.-I. and A. Noda 1967 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
24 Parikh, N. and S. Boyd 2014 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
25 Adrian, T., N. Boyarchenko, and D. Giannone 2019 4 1 8.0 0.025 0.644 100%
26 Kalman, R. E 1960 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
27 Robbins, H. and S. Monro 1951 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
28 Anderson, B. D. and J. B. Moore 2012 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
29 Bof, N., R. Carli, and L. Schenato 2018 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.511 50%
30 Koenker, R. and G. Bassett 1978 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
31 Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson 1996 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Terasvirta, T 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Chopin, N. and O. Papaspiliopoulos 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Toulis, P. and E. M. Airoldi 2015 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Toulis, P., D. Tran, and E. M. Airoldi 2016 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Orabona, F 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Cesa-Bianchi, N. and F. Orabona 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Kulis, B. and P. L. Bartlett 2010 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Amari, S.-i 1993 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Bottou, L 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Ljung, L 1977 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Benveniste, A. and G. Ruget 2003 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Kushner, H. and J. Yang 2002 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Creal, D., B. Schwaab, S. J. Koopman, and A. Lucas 2014 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Harvey, A. C. and R.-J. Lange (self) 2017 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Harvey, A. C. and R.-J. Lange (self) 2018 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Opschoor, A., P. Janus, A. Lucas, and D. van Dijk (self) 2018 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Gorgi, P 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Artemova, M., F. Blasques, J. van Brummelen, and S... 2022b 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Harvey, A. C 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Rue, H., S. Martino, and N. Chopin 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Koyama, S., L. Castellanos Perez-Bolde, C. R. Shal... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Bierman, G. J 1977 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Bertsekas, D. P 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Akyildiz, O. D., E. Chouzenoux, V. Elvira, and J. ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Simonetto, A. and P. Massioni 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Lange, R.-J (self) 2024b 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Hare, W. and C. Sagastizabal 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Grimmer, B., H. Lu, P. Worah, and V. Mirrokni 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Wu, L. and W. J. Su 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Krengel, U 1985 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Brandt, A 1986 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Beutner, E. A., Y. Lin, and A. Lucas 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Polson, N. G., J. G. Scott, and B. T. Willard 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Fearnhead, P. and L. Meligkotsidou 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Jagannathan, R. and Z. Wang 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Diniz, P. S 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Koenker, R. and K. F. Hallock 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Koenker, R. and J. A. Machado 1999 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Engle, R. F 2002 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Zou, H. and M. Yuan 2008 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Geraci, M. and M. Bottai 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Caivano, M., A. C. Harvey, and A. Luati 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Blasques, F., P. Gorgi, S. J. Koopman, and O. Wint... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
76 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.