Citation Analysis

Transferable Utility Matching Beyond Logit:\\ Computation and Estimation with General Heterogeneity %
Alfred Galichon, Antoine Jacquet, Georgy Salakhutdinov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23116

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

7,206

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Choo, E. and Siow, A.	2006	7	3	11.0	0.250	1.000	100%
2	Alfred Galichon and Bernard Salanié (self)	2022	6	3	9.0	0.214	1.000	100%
3	L. S. Shapley and M. Shubik	1971	3	3	3.5	0.107	0.737	67%
4	George B. Dantzig and Philip Wolfe	1960	2	2	3.0	0.071	0.644	100%
5	Pierre-André Chiappori and Bernard Salanié and Yor...	2017	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
6	Marion Goussé and Nicolas Jacquemet and Jean-Marc ...	2017	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
7	Alberto Bisin and Giulia Tura	2019	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
8	Edoardo Ciscato	2025	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
9	McFadden, Daniel	1981	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
10	Train, Kenneth E.	2009	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
11	McFadden, Daniel	1989	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
12	Cristina Gualdani and Shruti Sinha	2023	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
13	Pierre-André Chiappori and D. L. Nguyen and Bernar...	2019	1	1	1.0	0.036	0.406	100%
14	Gale, D. and Shapley, L. S.	1962	1	1	2.0	0.036	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.