Citation Analysis

Treatment Effects in the Regression Discontinuity Model with Counterfactual Cutoff and Distorted Running Variables
Moyu Liao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22886

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,798

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Grembi, Veronica and Nannicini, Tommaso and Troian...	2016	8	3	14.0	0.348	1.000	100%
2	Dong, Yingying and Lewbel, Arthur	2015	3	2	4.0	0.130	0.737	100%
3	Angrist, Joshua D and Rokkanen, Miikka	2015	3	2	4.0	0.130	0.737	100%
4	Lee, David S	2008	2	1	2.0	0.087	0.511	100%
5	Jones, M Chris and Linton, Oliver and Nielsen, Jen...	1995	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
6	Calonico, Sebastian and Cattaneo, Matias D and Tit...	2014	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
7	Armstrong, Timothy B and Kolesa	2020	1	1	2.0	0.043	0.406	100%
8	Pagan, Adrian and Ullah, Aman	1999	2	1	1.0	0.087	0.110	0%
9	Gine	2002	1	1	0.5	0.043	0.087	0%
10	Jianqing Fan and Irene Gijbels	1996	1	1	0.5	0.043	0.087	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.