Citation Analysis

Discrete Choice with Endogenous Peer Selection\\
Nail Kashaev, Natalia Lazzati
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21446
26
Citation mentions
20
Cited references
7
Sections
3,850
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kashaev, Lazzati and Xiao (self) 2025 3 2 5.0 0.115 0.737 100%
2 Blevins 2017 3 2 6.0 0.115 0.737 100%
3 Aguiar, Boccardi, Kashaev and Kim (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.077 0.644 100%
4 Blevins 2018 2 2 4.0 0.077 0.644 100%
5 Durlauf and Young 2001 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
6 Kashaev and Lazzati (self) 2019 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
7 Graham 2015 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
8 De Paula 2017 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
9 Chandrasekhar 2016 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
10 Leung 2015 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
11 Menzel 2015 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
12 Miyauchi 2016 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
13 Boucher and Mourifie 2017 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
14 Mele 2017 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
15 de Paula, Richards-Shubik and Tamer 2018 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
16 Thirkettle 2019 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
17 Ridder and Sheng 2020 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
18 Sheng 2020 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
19 Badev 2021 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
20 Gualdani 2021 1 1 1.0 0.038 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.