Citation Analysis – ReLU-Based and DNN-Based \\Generalized Maximum Score Estimators

ReLU-Based and DNN-Based \\Generalized Maximum Score Estimators
Xiaohong Chen, Wayne Yuan Gao, Likang Wen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19121

104

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

14,547

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Kim, J. and Pollard, D.	1990	9	4	18.0	0.087	1.000	100%
2	Horowitz, J. L.	1992	13	3	26.0	0.125	1.000	100%
3	---	1985	6	3	11.0	0.058	0.941	83%
4	--- and Gao, W. Y. (self)	2025	6	3	10.5	0.058	0.941	83%
5	Gao, W. Y. and Li, M. (self)	2024	7	2	14.0	0.067	0.874	100%
6	Manski, C. F.	1975	4	2	7.0	0.038	0.737	75%
7	---, --- and Xu, S.	2023	3	2	6.0	0.029	0.737	100%
8	Van Der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A.	1996	4	3	5.0	0.038	0.737	50%
9	Chen, X. (self)	2007	2	2	4.0	0.019	0.644	100%
10	Delsol, L. and Van Keilegom, I.	2020	3	2	4.5	0.029	0.644	67%
11	Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D. and...	2015	2	2	4.0	0.019	0.644	100%
12	Patra, R. K., Seijo, E. and Sen, B.	2018	3	1	6.0	0.029	0.585	100%
13	---		3	1	6.0	0.029	0.585	100%
14	--- and Christensen, T. M.	2015	12	5	9.0	0.115	0.550	17%
15	---, Linton, O. and Van Keilegom, I.	2003	2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
16	Ichimura, H. and Lee, S.	2010	2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
17	--- and ---	2018	2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
18	Seo, M. H. and Otsu, T.	2018	2	1	4.0	0.019	0.511	100%
19	Hansen, B. E.	2008	2	2	2.5	0.019	0.511	50%
20	---	1987	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
21	Blevins, J. R. and Khan, S.	2013	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
22	Chen, S. and Zhang, H. (self)	2015	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
23	Jun, S. J., Pinkse, J. and Wan, Y.	2017	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	Abrevaya, J. and Huang, J.	2005	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	---	2002	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M. and Nagasawa, K.	2020	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	Newey, K. and McFadden, D.	1994	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	--- and Todd, P. E.	2007	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	Kosorok, M. R.	2008	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	Dau, H. D., Laloe, T. and Servien, R.	2020	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Qiao, W.	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	Fan, F.-L., Xiong, J., Li, M. and Wang, G.	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	Zhang, Y., Ti\vno, P., Leonardis, A. and Tang, K.	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	Newey, W. K.		1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Evans, L. C. and Gariepy, R. F.	2015	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
36	Graham, B. S.	2017	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Kim, J. and Pollard, D.

1990

18.0

0.087

1.000

100%

Horowitz, J. L.

1992

26.0

0.125

1.000

100%

---

1985

11.0

0.058

0.941

83%

--- and Gao, W. Y. (self)

2025

10.5

0.058

0.941

83%

Gao, W. Y. and Li, M. (self)

2024

14.0

0.067

0.874

100%

Manski, C. F.

1975

7.0

0.038

0.737

75%

---, --- and Xu, S.

2023

6.0

0.029

0.737

100%

Van Der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A.

1996

5.0

0.038

0.737

50%

Chen, X. (self)

2007

4.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Delsol, L. and Van Keilegom, I.

2020

4.5

0.029

0.644

67%

Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D. and...

2015

4.0

0.019

0.644

100%

Patra, R. K., Seijo, E. and Sen, B.

2018

6.0

0.029

0.585

100%

---

6.0

0.029

0.585

100%

--- and Christensen, T. M.

2015

9.0

0.115

0.550

17%

---, Linton, O. and Van Keilegom, I.

2003

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Ichimura, H. and Lee, S.

2010

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

--- and ---

2018

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Seo, M. H. and Otsu, T.

2018

4.0

0.019

0.511

100%

Hansen, B. E.

2008

2.5

0.019

0.511

50%

---

1987

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Blevins, J. R. and Khan, S.

2013

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Chen, S. and Zhang, H. (self)

2015

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Jun, S. J., Pinkse, J. and Wan, Y.

2017

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Abrevaya, J. and Huang, J.

2005

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

---

2002

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Cattaneo, M. D., Jansson, M. and Nagasawa, K.

2020

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Newey, K. and McFadden, D.

1994

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

--- and Todd, P. E.

2007

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Kosorok, M. R.

2008

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Dau, H. D., Laloe, T. and Servien, R.

2020

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Qiao, W.

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Fan, F.-L., Xiong, J., Li, M. and Wang, G.

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Zhang, Y., Ti\vno, P., Leonardis, A. and Tang, K.

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Newey, W. K.

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Evans, L. C. and Gariepy, R. F.

2015

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Graham, B. S.

2017

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.