Citation Analysis

Empirical Likelihood for Random Forests \\ and Ensembles
Harold D. Chiang, Yukitoshi Matsushita, Taisuke Otsu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13934
87
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
8
Sections
6,243
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Matsushita, Yukitoshi and Otsu, Taisuke (self) 2021 5 3 7.5 0.057 1.000 100%
2 Peng, Wei and Coleman, Tim and Mentch, Lucas 2022 6 5 6.5 0.069 0.941 83%
3 Owen, Art B 1988 4 3 5.5 0.046 0.928 100%
4 Wager, Stefan and Athey, Susan 2018 17 5 20.5 0.195 0.890 71%
5 Breiman, Leo 2001 3 3 3.5 0.034 0.843 100%
6 Jing, Bing-Yi and Yuan, Junqing and Zhou, Wang 2009 3 3 3.5 0.034 0.843 100%
7 Wager, Stefan and Hastie, Trevor and Efron, Bradle... 2014 3 3 3.5 0.034 0.843 100%
8 Peng, Wei and Mentch, Lucas and Stefanski, Leonard 2025 5 4 4.5 0.057 0.843 60%
9 Efron, Bradley and Stein, Charles 1981 3 2 4.5 0.034 0.737 100%
10 Matsushita, Yukitoshi and Otsu, Taisuke (self) 2024 2 2 1.5 0.023 0.644 100%
11 Breiman, Leo 1996 2 2 2.5 0.023 0.644 100%
12 Mentch, Lucas and Hooker, Giles 2016 2 2 1.0 0.023 0.511 50%
13 DiCiccio, Cyrus and Romano, Joseph 2022 2 2 1.0 0.023 0.511 50%
14 Biau, Ge 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 Efron, Bradley 1992 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Biau, Ge 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Scornet, Erwan and Biau, Ge 2015 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Wager, Stefan and Walther, Guenther 2015 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Scornet, Erwan 2016 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Mentch, Lucas and Zhou, Siyu 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Chi, Chien-Ming and Vossler, Patrick and Fan, Ying... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Scornet, Erwan and Hooker, Giles 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Song, Yanglei and Chen, Xiaohui and Kato, Kengo 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Athey, Susan and Tibshirani, Julie and Wager, Stef... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Zhou, Zhengze and Mentch, Lucas and Hooker, Giles 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Ghosal, Indrayudh and Zhou, Yunzhe and Hooker, Gil... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Coleman, Tim and Peng, Wei and Mentch, Lucas 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Xu, Tianning and Zhu, Ruoqing and Shao, Xiaofeng 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Demirkaya, Emre and Fan, Yingying and Gao, Lan and... 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Juergens, Jakob R 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Owen, Art B 2001 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Chiang, Harold D and Matsushita, Yukitoshi and Ots... (self) 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Bertail, Patrice 2006 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Zhu, Lixing and Xue, Liugen 2006 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Hjort, Nils Lid and McKeague, Ian W and Van Keileg... 2009 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Bravo, Francesco and Escanciano, Juan Carlos and V... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Kitamura, Yuichi 2006 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Chen, Song Xi and Van Keilegom, Ingrid 2009 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Rokach, Lior 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Friedman, Jerome H 1991 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Owen, Art B 1990 2 1 1.0 0.023 0.110 0%
42 van der Vaart, Aad W. and Wellner, Jon A. 1996 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.