Citation Analysis

Risk-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Portfolio Optimization
Emmanuel Lwele, Sabuni Emmanuel, Sitali Gabriel Sitali
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11481
12
Citation mentions
10
Cited references
11
Sections
3,873
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Zuzana Jankova 2021 2 2 3.0 0.167 0.644 100%
2 Zhong, Xiao and Enke, David 2019 2 2 3.0 0.167 0.644 100%
3 Kilimci, Zeynep Hilal and Duvar, Ramazan 2020 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
4 Harnpadungkij, Thammasorn and Chaisangmongkon, War... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
5 Ghasemzadeha, Mohammad and Mohammad-Karimi, Naeime... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
6 Lim, Shiau Hong and Malik, Ilyas 2022 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
7 Molina, Gabriel 2016 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
8 Moody, John and Wu, Lizhong and Liao, Yuansong and... 1998 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
9 Basak, Suryoday and Kar, Saibal and Saha, Snehansh... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
10 Reddy, V Kranthi Sai and Sai, Kranthi 2018 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.