Citation Analysis – Unlocking the Regression Space

Unlocking the Regression Space
Liudas Giraitis, George Kapetanios, Yufei Li, Alexia Ventouri
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07183

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,221

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	White, H	1980	6	3	9.0	0.067	1.000	100%
2	Hall, A., S. Han, and O. Boldea	2012	4	2	6.0	0.045	0.811	100%
3	Karmakar, S., S. Richter, and W. B. Wu	2022	3	2	4.0	0.034	0.737	100%
4	Vogt, M	2012	3	2	4.0	0.034	0.737	100%
5	Hu, Z., I. Kasparis, and Q. Wang	2024	3	2	5.0	0.034	0.737	100%
6	Boldea, O., A. Cornea-Madeira, and A. Hall	2019	3	2	4.0	0.034	0.737	100%
7	Zhang, T. and W. Wu	2012	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
8	Georgiev, I., D. Harvey, S. Leybourn, and A. Rober...	2018	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
9	Fu, Z., Y. Hong, L. Su, and X. Wang	2023	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
10	Xu, K.-L. and P. Phillips	2008	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
11	Doukhan, P. and O. Wintenberger	2008	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
12	Bardet, J.-M. and O. Wintenberger	2009	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
13	Giraitis, L., Y. Li, and P. C. B. Phillips (self)	2024	2	2	4.0	0.022	0.644	100%
14	Lai, T. L. and C. Z. Wei	1982	2	1	2.0	0.022	0.511	100%
15	Cattaneo, M., M. Jansson, and W. Newey	2018	2	1	2.0	0.022	0.511	100%
16			2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
17			2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
18	Angrist, J. D. and J. S. Pischke	2010	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Leamer, E. E	1983	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	Leamer, E. E	2010	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	Wu, W	2005	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	Jochmans, K	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	Li, D., P. Phillips, and J. Gao	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Sun, Y., Y. Hong, T.-H. Lee, S. Wang, and X. Zhang	2021	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Linton, O. and Z. Xiao	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Eicker, F	1963	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27			1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Fan, J. and W. Zhang	1999	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Bai, J. and P. Perron	1998	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Zhang, T. and W. Wu	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Hansen, B	2000	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Hidalgo, J., Y. Lee, and M.-H. Seo	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Priestley, M. B	1965	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Robinson, P. M	1989	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
35	Robinson, P. M	1991	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Dahlhaus, R	1997	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
37	Dahlhaus, R., S. Richter, and W. Wu	2019	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
38	Dahlhaus, R. and S. Richter	2023	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
39	Dahlhaus, R. and L. Giraitis (self)	1998	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
40	Giraitis, L., G. Kapetanios, and T. Yates (self)	2020	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
41	Chow, G. C	1960	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
42	Brown, R. L., J. Durbin, and J. M. Evans	1975	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
43	Ploberger, W. and W. Kramer	1992	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
44	Hamilton, J. D	1989	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
45	Tong, H	1990	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
46	Terasvirta, T	1998	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
47	Nyblom, J	1989a	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
48	Cogley, T. and T. J. Sargent	2005	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
49	Primiceri, G. E	2005	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
50	Giraitis, L., G. Kapetanios, and T. Yates (self)	2014	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
51	Giraitis, L., G. Kapetanios, and T. Yates (self)	2018	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
52	Dendramis, Y., L. Giraitis, and G. Kapetanios (self)	2021	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
53	Chronopoulos, I., L. Giraitis, and G. Kapetanios (self)	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
54	Eraker, B., M. Johannes, and N. Polson	2003	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
55	Chan, J. C. C., G. Koop, and Y. Xuewen	2024	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
56	Carriero, A., T. E. Clark, M. Marcellino, and E. M...	2024	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
57	Nyblom, J	1989b	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
58	White, H	2014	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
59	Enders, C. K	2022	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
60	Giraitis, L., M. Taniguchi, and M. S. Taqqu (self)	2018	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
61	Brockwell, P. and R. Davis	1991	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
62			1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

White, H

1980

9.0

0.067

1.000

100%

Hall, A., S. Han, and O. Boldea

2012

6.0

0.045

0.811

100%

Karmakar, S., S. Richter, and W. B. Wu

2022

4.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Vogt, M

2012

4.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Hu, Z., I. Kasparis, and Q. Wang

2024

5.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Boldea, O., A. Cornea-Madeira, and A. Hall

2019

4.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Zhang, T. and W. Wu

2012

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Georgiev, I., D. Harvey, S. Leybourn, and A. Rober...

2018

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Fu, Z., Y. Hong, L. Su, and X. Wang

2023

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Xu, K.-L. and P. Phillips

2008

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Doukhan, P. and O. Wintenberger

2008

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Bardet, J.-M. and O. Wintenberger

2009

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Giraitis, L., Y. Li, and P. C. B. Phillips (self)

2024

4.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Lai, T. L. and C. Z. Wei

1982

2.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Cattaneo, M., M. Jansson, and W. Newey

2018

2.0

0.022

0.511

100%

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Angrist, J. D. and J. S. Pischke

2010

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Leamer, E. E

1983

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Leamer, E. E

2010

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Wu, W

2005

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Jochmans, K

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Li, D., P. Phillips, and J. Gao

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Sun, Y., Y. Hong, T.-H. Lee, S. Wang, and X. Zhang

2021

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Linton, O. and Z. Xiao

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Eicker, F

1963

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fan, J. and W. Zhang

1999

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Bai, J. and P. Perron

1998

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zhang, T. and W. Wu

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hansen, B

2000

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hidalgo, J., Y. Lee, and M.-H. Seo

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Priestley, M. B

1965

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Robinson, P. M

1989

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Robinson, P. M

1991

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dahlhaus, R

1997

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dahlhaus, R., S. Richter, and W. Wu

2019

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dahlhaus, R. and S. Richter

2023

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dahlhaus, R. and L. Giraitis (self)

1998

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Giraitis, L., G. Kapetanios, and T. Yates (self)

2020

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chow, G. C

1960

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Brown, R. L., J. Durbin, and J. M. Evans

1975

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Ploberger, W. and W. Kramer

1992

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hamilton, J. D

1989

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Tong, H

1990

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Terasvirta, T

1998

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Nyblom, J

1989a

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Cogley, T. and T. J. Sargent

2005

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Primiceri, G. E

2005

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Giraitis, L., G. Kapetanios, and T. Yates (self)

2014

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Giraitis, L., G. Kapetanios, and T. Yates (self)

2018

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dendramis, Y., L. Giraitis, and G. Kapetanios (self)

2021

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chronopoulos, I., L. Giraitis, and G. Kapetanios (self)

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Eraker, B., M. Johannes, and N. Polson

2003

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chan, J. C. C., G. Koop, and Y. Xuewen

2024

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Carriero, A., T. E. Clark, M. Marcellino, and E. M...

2024

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Nyblom, J

1989b

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

White, H

2014

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Enders, C. K

2022

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Giraitis, L., M. Taniguchi, and M. S. Taqqu (self)

2018

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Brockwell, P. and R. Davis

1991

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.