Citation Analysis – Specification tests for regression models with measurement errors

Specification tests for regression models with measurement errors
Xiaojun Song, Jichao Yuan
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04127

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,725

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Otsu, T. and Taylor, L	2021	12	7	21.0	0.135	1.000	100%
2	Meister, A	2009	5	4	9.0	0.056	1.000	100%
3	Dong, H. and Taylor, L	2022	9	6	13.5	0.101	0.874	67%
4	Delaigle, A., Hall, P., and Meister, A	2008	4	2	8.0	0.045	0.811	100%
5	Bierens, H. J	1982	3	2	4.0	0.034	0.737	100%
6	Hall, P. and Ma, Y	2007	3	2	4.0	0.034	0.737	100%
7	Sant’Anna, P. H. and Song, X (self)	2019	3	2	5.0	0.034	0.737	100%
8	van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A	1996	3	2	6.0	0.034	0.737	100%
9	Bierens, H. J. and Ploberger, W	1997	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
10	Taupin, M.-L	1998	2	2	4.0	0.022	0.644	100%
11	Mammen, E	1993	2	2	4.0	0.022	0.644	100%
12	Stute, W	1997	2	1	2.0	0.022	0.511	100%
13	Escanciano, J. C	2006	2	1	2.0	0.022	0.511	100%
14	Song, W (self)	2008	2	1	2.0	0.022	0.511	100%
15	Escanciano, J. C. and Goh, S.-C	2014	2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
16	Fan, Y	1995	2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
17	Kurisu, D. and Otsu, T	2022	3	2	3.0	0.034	0.511	33%
18	H\"ardle, W. and Mammen, E	1993	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
19	Zheng, J. X	1996	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
20	Stute, W., Manteiga, W. G., and Quindimil, M. P	1998	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
21	Stinchcombe, M. B. and White, H	1998	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
22	Stute, W. and Zhu, L.-X	2002	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
23	Zhu, L., Song, W., and Cui, H (self)	2003	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Zhu, L. and Cui, H	2005	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Xu, W. and Zhu, L	2015	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Tan, F., Guo, X., and Zhu, L	2025	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
27	Fuller, W. A	2009	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Hu, Y. and Wansbeek, T	2017	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Fan, Y. and Li, Q	2000	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Su, J. Q. and Wei, L	1991	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Durbin, J	1973	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Bierens, H. J	1990	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Carroll, R. J. and Hall, P	1988	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Stefanski, L. A. and Carroll, R. J	1990	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
35	Yang, Z., Song, X., and Yu, J (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Song, X. and Yang, Z (self)	2025	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
37	Dom\'\inguez, M. A. and Lobato, I. N	2015	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
38	Delaigle, A. and Gijbels, I	2004	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
39	McMurry, T. L. and Politis, D. N	2004	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
40	Cheng, C.-L. and Schneeweiss, H	1998	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
41	Chen, X. and White, H	1998	4	2	2.0	0.045	0.175	0%
42	Fan, J	1992	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Otsu, T. and Taylor, L

2021

21.0

0.135

1.000

100%

Meister, A

2009

9.0

0.056

1.000

100%

Dong, H. and Taylor, L

2022

13.5

0.101

0.874

67%

Delaigle, A., Hall, P., and Meister, A

2008

8.0

0.045

0.811

100%

Bierens, H. J

1982

4.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Hall, P. and Ma, Y

2007

4.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Sant’Anna, P. H. and Song, X (self)

2019

5.0

0.034

0.737

100%

van der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A

1996

6.0

0.034

0.737

100%

Bierens, H. J. and Ploberger, W

1997

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Taupin, M.-L

1998

4.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Mammen, E

1993

4.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Stute, W

1997

2.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Escanciano, J. C

2006

2.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Song, W (self)

2008

2.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Escanciano, J. C. and Goh, S.-C

2014

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Fan, Y

1995

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Kurisu, D. and Otsu, T

2022

3.0

0.034

0.511

33%

H\"ardle, W. and Mammen, E

1993

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zheng, J. X

1996

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stute, W., Manteiga, W. G., and Quindimil, M. P

1998

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stinchcombe, M. B. and White, H

1998

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stute, W. and Zhu, L.-X

2002

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zhu, L., Song, W., and Cui, H (self)

2003

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zhu, L. and Cui, H

2005

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Xu, W. and Zhu, L

2015

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Tan, F., Guo, X., and Zhu, L

2025

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fuller, W. A

2009

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hu, Y. and Wansbeek, T

2017

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Fan, Y. and Li, Q

2000

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Su, J. Q. and Wei, L

1991

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Durbin, J

1973

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Bierens, H. J

1990

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Carroll, R. J. and Hall, P

1988

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stefanski, L. A. and Carroll, R. J

1990

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Yang, Z., Song, X., and Yu, J (self)

2024

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Song, X. and Yang, Z (self)

2025

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Dom\'\inguez, M. A. and Lobato, I. N

2015

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Delaigle, A. and Gijbels, I

2004

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

McMurry, T. L. and Politis, D. N

2004

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Cheng, C.-L. and Schneeweiss, H

1998

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Chen, X. and White, H

1998

2.0

0.045

0.175

Fan, J

1992

0.5

0.011

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.