← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Leniency Designs: An Operator's Manual
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Peter Hull, Michal Kolesár
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03572
118
Citation mentions
57
Cited references
7
Sections
12,471
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bekker 1994 6 4 12.0 0.051 1.000 100%
2 Imbens, Angrist 1994 9 5 16.5 0.076 0.962 89%
3 Farre-Mensa, Hegde, Ljungqvist 2020 15 4 23.0 0.127 0.953 87%
4 Frandsen, Lefgren, Leslie 2023 6 3 10.5 0.051 0.941 83%
5 Kolesár (self) 2013 4 3 6.5 0.034 0.843 75%
6 Mikusheva, Sun 2022 4 2 8.0 0.034 0.811 100%
7 Kitagawa 2015 4 2 6.5 0.034 0.737 75%
8 Chao, Swanson, Woutersen 2023 3 2 6.0 0.025 0.737 100%
9 Angrist, Kolesár (self) 2024 3 2 6.0 0.025 0.737 100%
10 Abadie 2002 3 2 4.5 0.025 0.644 67%
11 Bound, Jaeger, Baker 1995 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
12 Sigstad 2025 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Anatolyev, Sø 2023 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
14 Yap 2025 4 1 8.0 0.034 0.644 100%
15 Evdokimov, Kolesár (self) 2018 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
16 Anderson, Rubin 1949 3 1 6.0 0.025 0.585 100%
17 Dobbie, Song 2015 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.511 50%
18 Matsushita, Otsu 2024 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
19 Abadie, Athey, Imbens, Wooldridge 2020 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
20 Abadie, Athey, Imbens, Wooldridge 2023 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
21 Chao, Swanson, Hausman, Newey, Woutersen 2012 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
22 Staiger, Stock 1997 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
23 Stock, Yogo 2005 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
24 Phillips, Hale 1977 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
25 Angrist, Imbens, Krueger 1999 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
26 Ackerberg, Devereux 2009 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Nagar 1959 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Angrist, Pischke 2009 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Frandsen, Leslie, McIntyre 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Kolesár, Plagborg-Mø (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Vytlacil 2002 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Chan, Gentzkow, Yu 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Heckman, Urzúa, Vytlacil 2006 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Roy 1951 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 de Chaisemartin 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Dobbie, Goldsmith-Pinkham, Yang (self) 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Coulibaly, Hsu, Mourifié, Wan 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Heckman, Vytlacil 2005 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Mogstad, Santos, Torgovitsky 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Blandhol, Bonney, Mogstad, Torgovitsky 2025 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull, Kolesár (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Angrist, Krueger 1991 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Lee 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Lemley, Sampat 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Sampat, Williams 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Hegde, Ljungqvist, Raj 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Bhuller, Sigstad 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Angrist, Hull, Walters (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Kolesár, Chetty, Friedman, Glaeser, Imbens (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Rao 1970 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Angrist, Imbens, Rubin 1996 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Dobbie, Goldin, Yang 2018 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
53 Dobbie, Liberman, Paravisini, Pathania 2021 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
54 Autor, Houseman 2010 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
55 Doyle 2007 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
56 Mullainathan, Obermeyer 2022 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
57 Chyn, Frandsen, Leslie 2025 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.