← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Using spatial modeling to address covariate measurement error
Susanne M. Schennach, Vincent Starck
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03306
83
Citation mentions
52
Cited references
11
Sections
11,105
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hu, Yingyao 2008 5 4 7.5 0.060 0.928 80%
2 Hu, Yingyao and Schennach, Susanne M (self) 2008 13 6 20.5 0.157 0.916 77%
3 Michalopoulos, Stelios and Papaioannou, Elias 2013 6 2 11.0 0.072 0.874 100%
4 Carbon, Michel and Tran, Lanh Tat and Wu, Berlin 1997 5 3 5.5 0.060 0.737 40%
5 Pinkse, Joris and Slade, Margaret E 2010 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
6 S. M. Schennach (self) 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
7 Amemiya, Y. 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
8 Nordman, Daniel J and Lahiri, Soumendra N and Frid... 2007 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
9 E. Carlstein 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
10 P. J. Bickel and D. A. Freedman 2 2 2.5 0.024 0.511 50%
11 Zhou, Chenghu and Su, Fenzhen and Harvey, Francis ... 2017 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
12 A. de Paula 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
13 Redding, Stephen J and Rossi-Hansberg, Esteban 2017 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
14 D. G. Krige 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
15 J. P. Chil\`es and N. Desassis 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
16 N. Cressie 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
17 Szpiro, Adam A. and Sheppard, Lianne and Lumley, T... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
18 Alexeeff, Stacey E. and Carroll, Raymond J. and Co... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
19 Y. Hu and M. Shum 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
20 Cunha, Flavio and Heckman, James J and Schennach, ... (self) 2010 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
21 Z. Griliches and J. A. Hausman 1986 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 H. H. Kelejian and I. R. Prucha 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Y. Bramoulle and H. Djebbari and B. Fortin 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 I. T. Jolliffe 1986 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 F. Gunsilius and S. M. Schennach (self) 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Gunsilius, Florian and Schennach, Susanne (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 W. K. Newey and J. L. Powell 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 P. Hall and J. L. Horowitz 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Y. Hu and R. Xiao 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 J. B. Kruskal 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Conley, Timothy G 1999 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Bolthausen, Erwin 1982 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Lahiri, SN 2003 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Hallin, Marc and Lu, Zudi and Tran, Lanh T 2004 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Sun, Yiguo 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Sun, Yiguo and Malikov, Emir 2018 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 X. Shen 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 S. M. Schennach (self) 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 M. J. van der Laan and S. Dudoit and S. Keles 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 X. Chen 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Jenish, Nazgul and Prucha, Ingmar R 2009 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Hall, Peter and Horowitz, Joel L and Jing, Bing-Yi 1995 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 A. W. van der Vaart 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Botev, Zdravko I and Grotowski, Joseph F and Kroes... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Murdock, George Peter 1969 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Henderson, J Vernon and Storeygard, Adam and Weil,... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
47 Elvidge, Christopher D and Baugh, Kimberley E and ... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
48 Doll, Christopher NH and Muller, Jan-Peter and Mor... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
49 S. M. Schennach (self) 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
50 W. Newey and D. McFadden 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
51 W. Newey 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
52 D. W. K. Andrews 1995 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.