Citation Analysis

Large Bayesian Tensor Autoregressions
Yaling Qi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03097
77
Citation mentions
48
Cited references
10
Sections
9,356
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kolda, Tamara G and Bader, Brett W 2009 5 5 9.0 0.065 1.000 100%
2 Wang, Di and Zheng, Yao and Li, Guodong 2024 4 2 6.0 0.052 0.811 100%
3 Chan, Joshua CC and Qi, Yaling 2025 3 2 5.0 0.039 0.737 100%
4 Chan, Joshua CC and Qi, Yaling 2024 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
5 Harshman, Richard A and others 1970 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
6 Carroll, J Douglas and Chang, Jih-Jie 1970 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
7 Tucker, Ledyard R 1963 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
8 Levin, Joseph 1965 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
9 Tucker, Ledyard R 1966 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
10 Billio, Monica and Casarin, Roberto and Iacopini, ... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
11 Koop, G. and Korobilis, D. 2013 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
12 Chan, Joshua CC 2023 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
13 Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi 2020 2 2 3.0 0.026 0.644 100%
14 Hoff, Peter D 2015 3 1 3.0 0.039 0.585 100%
15 Zhou, Hua and Li, Lexin and Zhu, Hongtu 2013 3 1 3.0 0.039 0.585 100%
16 Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi and Qamar, Shaan and Dunson, ... 2017 3 1 3.0 0.039 0.585 100%
17 Ding, Shanshan and Dennis Cook, R 2018 2 1 2.0 0.026 0.511 100%
18 Chen, Rong and Xiao, Han and Yang, Dan 2021 2 1 2.0 0.026 0.511 100%
19 Wang, Kunbo and Xu, Yanxun 2024 2 1 2.0 0.026 0.511 100%
20 Guichard, Ste 2011 2 1 4.0 0.026 0.511 100%
21 Canova, Fabio and Ciccarelli, Matteo 2013 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
22 Pesaran, M Hashem and Schuermann, Til and Weiner, ... 2004 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
23 Dees, Stephane and Mauro, Filippo di and Pesaran, ... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
24 Bussie 2009 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
25 Ba\'n 2010 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
26 Koop, G. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
28 Wang, Dong and Liu, Xialu and Chen, Rong 2019 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
29 Chen, Elynn Y and Tsay, Ruey S and Chen, Rong 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
30 Zhang, Wei 2024 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
31 Zhou, Jing and Bhattacharya, Anirban and Herring, ... 2015 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
32 Rabusseau, Guillaume and Kadri, Hachem 2016 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
33 Lock, Eric F 2018 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
34 Li, Xiaoshan and Xu, Da and Zhou, Hua and Li, Lexi... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
35 Spencer, Daniel and Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi and Prado... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
36 T. Cogley and T. J. Sargent 2005 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
37 Sims, C. A. and Zha, T. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
38 Carriero, A. and Clark, T. E. and Marcellino, M. a... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.013 0.406 100%
39 Carriero, A. and Clark, T. E. and Marcellino, M. G... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
40 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
41 Chan, Joshua CC and Eisenstat, Eric and Hou, Cheng... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
42 Stock, James H and Watson, Mark W 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
43 Carriero, Andrea and Clark, Todd E and Marcellino,... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
44 De Lathauwer, Lieven and De Moor, Bart and Vandewa... 2000 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
45 Carvalho, Carlos M and Polson, Nicholas G and Scot... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
46 Brown, Philip J and Griffin, Jim E 2010 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
47 Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi and Spencer, Daniel 2021 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
48 Ritter, Christian and Tanner, Martin A 1992 1 1 2.0 0.013 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.