Citation Analysis

The Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Long-Term Experimentation
Daniel Ting, Kenneth Hung
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02792

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

1,640

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Azevedo, Deng, Montiel\bibnamedelima Olea, Rao, We...	2020	2	2	3.0	0.222	0.644	100%
2	Sudijono, Ejdemyr, Lal, Tingley	2024	2	2	3.0	0.222	0.644	100%
3	Ting, Hung (self)	2023	1	1	1.0	0.111	0.406	100%
4	Wang, Burke	2019	1	1	1.0	0.111	0.406	100%
5	Duan, Ba, Zhang	2021	1	1	1.0	0.111	0.406	100%
6	Welling, Teh	2011	1	1	2.0	0.111	0.406	100%
7	Ø	2003	1	1	2.0	0.111	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.