Citation Analysis

Peer effect analysis with latent processes
Vincent Starck
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02764
50
Citation mentions
36
Cited references
5
Sections
7,796
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Angrist, Joshua D 2014 5 2 8.0 0.100 0.874 100%
2 Manski, Charles F 1993 4 2 5.0 0.080 0.811 100%
3 Bramoulle 2009 3 2 4.0 0.060 0.737 100%
4 Boucher, Vincent and Rendall, Michelle and Ushchev... 2024 2 2 3.0 0.040 0.644 100%
5 Blume, Lawrence E and Brock, William A and Durlauf... 2015 3 1 3.0 0.060 0.585 100%
6 Hayes, Alex and Levin, Keith 2024 2 1 2.0 0.040 0.511 100%
7 Newey, Whitney K and McFadden, Daniel 1994 2 1 4.0 0.040 0.511 100%
8 De Giorgi, Giacomo and Pellizzari, Michele and Red... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
9 Martellosio, Federico 2022 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
10 Gibbons, Stephen and Overman, Henry G 2012 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
11 Wang, William W and Jadbabaie, Ali 2025 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Sacerdote, Bruce 2014 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alex and Volpe, Os... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Banerjee, Abhijit and Chandrasekhar, Arun G and Du... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 He, Xiaoqi and Song, Kyungchul 2018 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Shaikh, Azeem M and Toulis, Panos 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido W 2022 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Neyman, Jerzy 1923 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 Rubin, Donald B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Toulis, Panos and Kao, Edward 2013 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 Sofrygin, Oleg and van der Laan, Mark J 2016 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Aronow, Peter M and Samii, Cyrus 2017 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Arpino, Bruno and Benedictis, Luca De and Mattei, ... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Liu, Lan and Hudgens, Michael G and Saul, Bradley ... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 Forastiere, Laura and Airoldi, Edoardo M and Meall... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Jackson, Matthew O and Lin, Zhongjian and Yu, Ning... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Sa 2021 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 Huber, Martin and Steinmayr, Andreas 2021 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
29 Egami, Naoki and Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J 2024 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
30 Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla and Thomas, Andrew C 2011 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
31 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Paul and Imbens, Guido W 2013 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
32 Graham, Bryan S 2017 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
33 Auerbach, Eric 2022 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
34 Starck, Vincent (self) 2025 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
35 De Paula, A 2018 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
36 Whitt, Ward 2007 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.