← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\large\bfEmergent Dynamical Spatial Boundaries in Emergency Medical Services: A Navier-Stokes Framework from First Principles
Tatsuru Kikuchi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26810
112
Citation mentions
44
Cited references
12
Sections
8,670
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Larsen, M. P., Eisenberg, M. S., Cummins, R. O., a... 1993 5 5 9.0 0.045 1.000 100%
2 McLafferty, S. and Grady, S 2012 6 5 11.0 0.054 1.000 100%
3 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024c 6 6 12.0 0.054 1.000 100%
4 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024b 5 5 10.0 0.045 1.000 100%
5 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024d 6 5 12.0 0.054 1.000 100%
6 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024e 6 5 12.0 0.054 1.000 100%
7 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024f 7 5 14.0 0.062 1.000 100%
8 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024g 8 5 16.0 0.071 1.000 100%
9 Carr, B. G., Branas, C. C., Metlay, J. P., Sulliva... 2017 11 6 22.0 0.098 1.000 100%
10 Saver, J. L 2006 4 4 7.0 0.036 0.928 100%
11 Vukmir, R. B 2006 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
12 Kikuchi, T (self) 2024a 3 3 6.0 0.027 0.843 100%
13 Newgard, C. D., Schmicker, R. H., Hedges, J. R., e... 2010 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 McCoy, C. E. and Hsia, R. Y 2013 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Butts, K. and Gardner, J 2023 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
16 Church, R. and ReVelle, C 1974 2 2 2.5 0.018 0.644 100%
17 Mann, N. C., Kane, L., Dai, M., and Jacobson, K 2015 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
18 Garrison, H. G., Runyan, C. W., Tintinalli, J. E.,... 2019 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Kline, P. and Moretti, E 2014 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
20 Müller, U. K. and Watson, M. W 2022 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
21 Canto, J. G., Rogers, W. J., Goldberg, R. J., et a... 2012 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
22 Hsia, R. Y., Srebotnjak, T., Kanzaria, H. K., et a... 2011 2 1 4.0 0.018 0.511 100%
23 Meretoja, A., Keshtkaran, M., Saver, J. L., et al 2014 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Dinh, M. M., Russell, S. B., Bein, K. J., et al 2013 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Donaldson, D. and Hornbeck, R 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Busso, M., Gregory, J., and Kline, P 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Anselin, L 1988 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 LeSage, J. and Pace, R. K 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Bia, M. and Mattei, A 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Conley, T. G 1999 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Müller, U. K. and Watson, M. W 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Ativie, F., Kekeç, D., Sørensen, J. T., et al 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Fan, J. and Gijbels, I 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Pagan, A. and Ullah, A 1999 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Athey, S. and Imbens, G. W 2019 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Diez Roux, A. V. and Mair, C 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Blackwell, T. H. and Kaufman, J. S 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Viscusi, W. K 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Green, L. V. and Kolesar, P. J 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Claesson, A., Fredman, D., Svensson, L., et al 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Boutilier, J. J., Brooks, S. C., Janmohamed, A., e... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Peleg, K. and Pliskin, J. S 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 McCormack, R. and Coates, G 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Daskin, M. S 1995 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.