Citation Analysis

A Unified Theory for Causal Inference: Direct Debiased Machine Learning via Bregman-Riesz Regression
Masahiro Kato
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26783
40
Citation mentions
20
Cited references
8
Sections
2,256
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 8 6 13.0 0.200 1.000 100%
2 4 4 6.0 0.100 0.928 100%
3 3 3 4.0 0.075 0.843 100%
4 3 3 6.0 0.075 0.843 100%
5 4 2 8.0 0.100 0.811 100%
6 3 2 6.0 0.075 0.737 100%
7 2 2 4.0 0.050 0.644 100%
8 1 1 1.0 0.025 0.406 100%
9 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
10 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
11 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
12 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
13 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
14 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
15 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
16 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
17 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
18 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
19 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
20 1 1 2.0 0.025 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.