Citation Analysis

Inference on Welfare and Value Functionals \\ under Optimal Treatment Assignment
Xiaohong Chen, Zhenxiao Chen, Wayne Yuan Gao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25607
49
Citation mentions
19
Cited references
10
Sections
4,232
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kitagawa, T. and Tetenov, A. 2018 13 5 23.0 0.265 1.000 100%
2 --- and Gao, W. Y. (self) 2025 11 4 16.0 0.224 0.969 91%
3 Chen, X., Christensen, T. and Kankanala, S. (self) 2025 3 2 6.0 0.061 0.737 100%
4 --- and Liao, Z. 2014 2 2 4.0 0.041 0.644 100%
5 Cattaneo, M. D., Titiunik, R. and Yu, R. R. 2 1 1.0 0.041 0.511 100%
6 ---, --- and --- 2 1 1.0 0.041 0.511 100%
7 Whitehouse, J., Austern, M. and Syrgkanis, V. 2025 2 1 1.0 0.041 0.511 100%
8 --- and Pouzo, D. 2015 2 1 4.0 0.041 0.511 100%
9 --- and Christensen, T. M. 2018 2 2 2.5 0.041 0.511 50%
10 Bhattacharya, D. and Dupas, P. 2012 1 1 0.5 0.020 0.406 100%
11 Park, G. 2025 1 1 0.5 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Feng, K., Hong, H. and Nekipelov, D. 2025 1 1 0.5 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Delfour, M. C. and Zolesio, J.-P. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 ---, --- and Sun, Y. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Evans, L. C. and Gariepy, R. F. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 --- and --- 2015 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Bloom, H. S., Orr, L. L., Bell, S. H., Cave, G., D... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Stone, C. J., Hansen, M. H., Kooperberg, C. and Tr... 1997 1 1 0.5 0.020 0.087 0%
19 Schellhase, C. and Kauermann, G. 2012 1 1 0.5 0.020 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.