Citation Analysis

Mixed LR-$C(\alpha)$-type tests for irregular hypotheses, \\ general criterion functions and misspecified models
Jean-Marie Dufour, Purevdorj Tuvaandorj
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17070
107
Citation mentions
80
Cited references
9
Sections
5,886
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ketz, P 2018 7 3 12.0 0.065 1.000 100%
2 4 3 7.0 0.037 0.928 100%
3 Cavaliere, G., H. B. Nielsen, R. S. Pedersen, and ... 2022 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
4 3 2 5.0 0.028 0.737 100%
5 3 2 5.0 0.028 0.737 100%
6 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
7 Francq, C. and J.-M. Zakoian 2019 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
8 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 Dufour, J.-M., A. Trognon, and P. Tuvaandorj (self) 2017 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 3 1 3.0 0.028 0.585 100%
13 Croissant, Y. and G. Millo 2019 3 1 6.0 0.028 0.585 100%
14 Moran, P. A. P 1973 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
15 2 1 2.0 0.019 0.511 100%
16 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
17 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
18 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Kilian, L. and H. Lutkepohl 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Wooldridge, J. M 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 DeJong, D. N. and C. Dave 2012 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Imbens, G. W. and T. Lancaster 1994 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Ridder, G. and R. Moffitt 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Cocci, M. D. and M. Plagborg-M\oller 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Le Cam, L 1956 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Bhat, B. R. and B. N. Nagnur 1965 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Buhler, W. J. and P. S. Puri 1966 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Bartoo, J. B. and P. S. Puri 1967 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Moran, P. A. P 1970 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
47 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
48 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
49 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
50 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
51 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
52 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
53 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
54 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
55 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
56 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
57 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
58 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
59 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
60 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
61 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
62 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Gu, J 2016 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
71 Gu, J., R. Koenker, and S. Volgushev 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Dufour, J.-M. and M. Takano (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
73 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
74 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
75 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
76 Hansen, B. E 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
77 Cameron, A. C. and P. K. Trivedi 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
78 Horrace, W. C. and P. Schmidt 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
79 Druska, V. and W. C. Horrace 2004 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
80 Feng, Q. and W. C. Horrace 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.