Citation Analysis

\textbf Equilibrium-Constrained Estimation of Recursive Logit Choice Models
Hung Tran, Tien Mai, Minh Hoang Ha
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16886
93
Citation mentions
41
Cited references
9
Sections
16,380
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 M. Fosgerau and E. Frejinger and A. Karlstrom 2013 6 4 10.0 0.065 1.000 100%
2 Tran, Hung and Mai, Tien (self) 2024 9 6 15.5 0.097 1.000 100%
3 John Rust 1987 5 4 6.0 0.054 1.000 100%
4 Tien Mai and Emma Frejinger (self) 2022 7 6 10.0 0.075 1.000 100%
5 Mogens Fosgerau and Daniel McFadden and Michel Bie... 2013 6 3 7.5 0.065 1.000 100%
6 Mai, Tien and Bastin, Fabian and Frejinger, Emma (self) 2018 5 3 5.5 0.054 1.000 100%
7 MOSEK ApS 2023 4 4 5.5 0.043 0.928 100%
8 Tien Mai and Mogens Fosgerau and Emma Frejinger (self) 2015 7 4 7.0 0.075 0.894 71%
9 Mai, Tien (self) 2016 3 3 2.0 0.032 0.737 67%
10 Iskhakov, Fedor and Lee, Jaap H. and Rust, John an... 2016 3 2 3.0 0.032 0.737 100%
11 J.-B. Baillon and R. Cominetti 2008 2 2 2.5 0.022 0.644 100%
12 Stephen P. Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe 2004 2 2 2.5 0.022 0.644 100%
13 Su, Che-Lin and Judd, Kenneth L. 2012 2 2 2.5 0.022 0.644 100%
14 Mai, Tien and Yu, Xinlian and Gao, Song and Frejin... (self) 2021 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.511 100%
15 Oyama, Yuki and Hato, Eiji 2017 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.511 100%
16 MOSEK ApS 2024 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
17 Yurii Nesterov and Arkadi Nemirovskii 1994 2 1 4.0 0.022 0.511 100%
18 Zimmermann, Maelle and Blom Västberg, Oskar and Fr... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 John Rust 1994 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Ben-Akiva, M. and Bierlaire, M. 1999 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Kenneth Train 2003 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Domencich, Thomas A. and McFadden, Daniel 1975 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Prato, Carlo G. 2009 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
24 de Moraes Ramos, Giselle and Mai, Tien and Daamen,... (self) 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Melo, E. 2012 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Zimmermann, Mae 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Tien Mai and Avinandan Bose and Arunesh Sinha and ... (self) 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Zimmermann, Mae 2020 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Yurii Nesterov and Arkadi Nemirovski 2006 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Arcidiacono, Peter and Ellickson, Paul B. and Park... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Joachim Dahl and Erling D. Andersen 2022 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Se 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Schjerning, Bertel 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Chandra R. Bhat 2005 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Chandra R. Bhat 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Daniel McFadden 1981 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Kazuo Fujisawa and Masakazu Kojima and Makoto Shid... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Bruno Chares 2012 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Penrose, Mathew D. 2003 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Mai, Tien and Lodi, Andrea (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Talluri, Kalyan and Van Ryzin, Garrett 2004 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.