← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

On Quantile Treatment Effects, Rank Similarity,\\ and Variation of Instrumental Variables
Sukjin Han, Haiqing Xu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16681
88
Citation mentions
56
Cited references
7
Sections
21,261
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 5 4 9.0 0.057 1.000 100%
2 Milgrom, P. and I. Segal 2002 10 5 19.0 0.114 1.000 100%
3 Chernozhukov, V. and C. Hansen 2005 4 3 6.0 0.045 0.928 100%
4 Bonnans, J. F. and A. Shapiro 2000 4 4 7.0 0.045 0.928 100%
5 Pomatto, L., P. Strack, and O. Tamuz 2020 5 2 9.0 0.057 0.874 100%
6 Fang, Z. and A. Santos 2019 4 2 6.0 0.045 0.811 100%
7 Vuong, Q. and H. Xu 2017 3 2 5.0 0.034 0.737 100%
8 Shapiro, A. 1991 2 2 3.0 0.023 0.644 100%
9 Mogstad, M., A. Torgovitsky, and C. R. Walters 2021 2 2 4.0 0.023 0.644 100%
10 Christensen, T. M. and B. Connault 2023 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
11 Goff, L. and E. D. Mbakop 2025 2 1 2.0 0.023 0.511 100%
12 Foresi, S. and F. Peracchi 1995 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
13 Heckman, J. J., J. Smith, and N. Clements 1997 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
14 Chesher, A. 2003 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
15 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
16 Vytlacil, E. and N. Yildiz 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
17 Jun, S. J., J. Pinkse, and H. Xu 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
18 Shaikh, A. M. and E. J. Vytlacil 2011 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 D'Haultfoeuille, X. and P. Fevrier 2015 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Torgovitsky, A. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Han, S. (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Maasoumi, E. and L. Wang 2019 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Frandsen, B. R. and L. J. Lefgren 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Dong, Y. and S. Shen 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Kim, J. H. and B. G. Park 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Rubin, D. B. 1974 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Manski, C. F. 1990 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1997 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper 2000 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Mogstad, M., A. Santos, and A. Torgovitsky 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Han, S. and S. Yang (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Ekeland, I. and R. Temam 1999 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Andrews, D. W. 1999 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Chernozhukov, V., H. Hong, and E. Tamer 2007 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Hsieh, Y.-W., X. Shi, and M. Shum 2022 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 Fang, Z., A. Santos, A. M. Shaikh, and A. Torgovit... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Heckman, J. J. and R. Robb 1986 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Buchholz, N., M. Shum, and H. Xu 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 de Castro, L. I. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, and H. White 1989 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1994 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Blundell, R., A. Gosling, H. Ichimura, and C. Megh... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin 1997 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Hettich, R. and K. O. Kortanek 1993 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Pagan, A. and A. Ullah 1999 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 van der Vaart, A. W. and J. A. Wellner 1996 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Hardle, W., A. Werwatz, M. Muller, and S. Sperlich 2004 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Billingsley, P. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Sion, M. 1958 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Rockafellar, R. T. 1970 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Hong, H. and J. Li 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 van der Vaart, A. W. 1998 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Rockafellar, R. T. and R. J. Wets 1998 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.